Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 May 14;14(5):e24985.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.24985. eCollection 2022 May.

The Effectiveness of Periodontally Accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics (PAOO) in Accelerating Tooth Movement and Supporting Alveolar Bone Thickness During Orthodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

The Effectiveness of Periodontally Accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics (PAOO) in Accelerating Tooth Movement and Supporting Alveolar Bone Thickness During Orthodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review

Hallaj I Alsino et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

The current review aimed to critically and systematically evaluate the available evidence regarding the effectiveness of periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics (PAOO) in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement and supporting the alveolar bone. Additionally, this review aimed to analyze the untoward effects of this procedure and the patient-reported outcome measures. A comprehensive electronic search was performed on 10 databases in addition to a manual search to retrieve all relevant studies. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were only included in this review. The interventional group was the PAOO procedure, whereas the control group was either a non-accelerated traditional fixed orthodontic treatment or an accelerated treatment using any other intervention. The Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized controlled trials (RoB 2) was employed to estimate the risk of bias in the included studies. The current review included eight RCTs evaluating 175 participants (63 males and 112 females) with a mean age ranging from 18.8 to 29.6 years. Five of them assessed the effectiveness of PAOO versus traditional orthodontic treatment, i.e. without any adjuvant surgical intervention. At the same time, the remaining three studies evaluated the effectiveness of PAOO versus corticotomy-only as an adjunctive procedure. The PAOO accelerated the leveling and alignment stage from 39% to 47% and accelerated the retraction of the upper anterior teeth from 41% to 61% compared to conventional orthodontic treatment. One study only indicated that PAOO reduced treatment time by 30.3% versus a corticotomy-only as an adjunctive procedure. No significant side effects have been reported with the PAOO procedure. The PAOO procedure was effective in accelerating orthodontic movement and tended to increase the thickness of the alveolar bone. But most periodontal outcome measures regarding PAOO application were not comprehensively covered in the included trials.

Keywords: accelerated tooth movement; acceleration of leveling and alignment; alveolar bone thickness; bone density; bone grafts; conventional orthodontic treatment; corticotomy; patient-reported outcome measures; periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics (paoo).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram of study identification, screening, eligibility and inclusion into the review.
PAOO: periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics
Figure 2
Figure 2. Assessment of the risk of bias in each study included in this review.
The risk of bias figure contains eight studies with the following authors: Shoreibah et al. [32], Abbas and Moutamed [28], Bhattacharya et al. [30], Al-Naoum et al. [19], Wu et al. [18], Aristizabal et al. [29], Bahammam [17], and Chandra et al. [31].
Figure 3
Figure 3. The overall risk of bias in the included studies.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Assessment of changes following en-masse retraction with mini-implants anchorage compared to two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial. Al-Sibaie S, Hajeer MY. Eur J Orthod. 2014;36:275–283. - PubMed
    1. Corticotomy facilitated orthodontics: review of a technique. Alghamdi AS. Saudi Dent J. 2010;22:1–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Evaluation of treatment outcomes of en masse retraction with temporary skeletal anchorage devices in comparison with two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with dentoalveolar protrusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Khlef HN, Hajeer MY, Ajaj MA, Heshmeh O. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018;9:513–523. - PMC - PubMed
    1. En-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth in adult patients with maxillary or bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Khlef HN, Hajeer MY, Ajaj MA, Heshmeh O. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019;20:113–127. - PubMed
    1. Effectiveness of minimally invasive surgical procedures in the acceleration of tooth movement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Alfawal AM, Hajeer MY, Ajaj MA, Hamadah O, Brad B. Prog Orthod. 2016;17:33. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources