Stability of transversal correction with hybrid maxillary expansion appliance in bone and tegumental piriformis opening in relation to bone age and maturation of the midpalatal suture
- PMID: 35582350
- PMCID: PMC9094721
- DOI: 10.4317/jced.59575
Stability of transversal correction with hybrid maxillary expansion appliance in bone and tegumental piriformis opening in relation to bone age and maturation of the midpalatal suture
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the stability of the transverse correction with a hybrid maxillary expansion appliance in the bone and tegumental piriformis opening in relation to bone age and maturation of the midpalatal suture (MPS).
Material and methods: 15 patients with a mean initial age of 14.9 years (SD=1.50), 7 (46.7%) were female and 8 (53.3%) were male, treated with a hybrid maxillary expander. Cone beam computed tomographic (CBCT) images were collected in three phases: T1 (orthodontic records), T2 (21.33 days (SD=10.68) after the end of expansion screw activation) and T3 after 9.13 months (DP=2.41) after the expansion screw was activated. In CBCT, measurements were performed in the nasal cavity considering the tegumental piriform opening (sagittal-axial sections) and bone (sagittal-axial-coronal sections) and the stage of MPS maturation (sagittal-axial sections). Repeated measures ANOVA was used for continuous variables and Friedman's ANOVA for the ordinal variable followed by Bonferroni's tests for p<0.001, in relation to time.
Results: There were significant differences between T1 and T2 (p=0.041), between T2 and T3 (p<0.001) and between T1 and T3 (p=0.041). Regarding bone age by cervical vertebrae maturation, 20% were in stage CS3, 40% in stage CS4, 26.7% in stage CS5 and 13.3% in stage CS6. There was a significant increase in tegumental piriformis opening between T1 (M=32.19, SD=3.79) and T2 (M=34.82, SD=2.81) (p=0.008), followed by a significant decrease in T3 (M=34.64, SD=2.73) (p=0.021), as well as in the opening of the bone piriform, between T1 (M=21.30, SD=2.47) and T2 (M=25.35, SD=2.21) (p<0.001), followed by a significant decrease in T3 (M=24.89, SD =2.30) (p=0.018).
Conclusions: The hybrid maxillary expansion appliance was effective in opening the midpalatal suture of all patients in the present study, without influence of the initial stage of MPS maturation and bone age. There was a relapse of the increase in the bone and tegumental piriform openings. Key words:Maxillary expansion, orthodontic anchorage procedures, nose.
Copyright: © 2022 Medicina Oral S.L.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest There are no fundings and no conflict of interest to report.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Effects of bonded rapid palatal expansion on the transverse dimensions of the maxilla: a cone-beam computed tomography study.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Apr;137(4 Suppl):S79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.11.024. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010. PMID: 20381765
-
Changes in the midpalatal and pterygopalatine sutures induced by micro-implant-supported skeletal expander, analyzed with a novel 3D method based on CBCT imaging.Prog Orthod. 2017 Nov 1;18(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40510-017-0188-7. Prog Orthod. 2017. PMID: 29090368 Free PMC article.
-
Dentoskeletal changes and their correlations after micro-implant-assisted palatal expansion (MARPE) in adults with advanced midpalatal suture ossification.Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Mar;26(3):3021-3031. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04284-x. Epub 2021 Nov 13. Clin Oral Investig. 2022. PMID: 34773143
-
Midpalatal suture maturation in 15- to 35-year-olds: morphological assessment in the coronal plane using CBCT-an exploratory study.Odontology. 2024 Apr;112(2):647-656. doi: 10.1007/s10266-023-00861-6. Epub 2023 Oct 18. Odontology. 2024. PMID: 37851186
-
Midpalatal Suture Maturation Method for the Assessment of Maturation before Maxillary Expansion: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 13;12(11):2774. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112774. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36428834 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of Anchorage Modifications on the Efficacy of Miniscrew-Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cureus. 2024 Oct 21;16(10):e72008. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72008. eCollection 2024 Oct. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39569259 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Bazargani F, Lund H, Magnuson A, Ludwig B. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects using tooth-borne and tooth-bone-borne RME appliances: a randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. Eur J Orthod. 2021;43:245–53. - PubMed
-
- Yi F, Liu S, Lei L, Liu O, Zhang L, Peng Q. Changes of the upper airway and bone in microimplant-assisted rapid palatal expansion: A cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) study. J Xray Sci Technol. 2020;28:271–83. - PubMed
-
- Betts N, Vanarsdall R, Barber H, Higgins-Barber K, Fonseca R. Diagnosis and treatment of transverse maxillary difficiency. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthoggnath Surg. 1955;10:75–96. - PubMed
-
- Coloccia G, Inchingolo AD, Inchingolo AM, Malcangi G, Montenegro V, Patano A. Effectiveness of Dental and Maxillary Transverse Changes in Tooth-Borne, Bone-Borne, and Hybrid Palatal Expansion through Cone-Beam Tomography: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Medicina (Kaunas) 2021;57:288. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Adina S, Dipalma G, Bordea IR, Lucaciu O, Feurdean C, Inchingolo AD. Orthopedic joint stability influences growth and maxillary development: clinical aspects. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2020;34:747–56. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources