Pulp sensibility tests responses in patients with anxiety and depression
- PMID: 35582351
- PMCID: PMC9094724
- DOI: 10.4317/jced.59242
Pulp sensibility tests responses in patients with anxiety and depression
Abstract
Background: In view of the importance of pulp sensibility tests in clinical decision-making and the impact of psychological factors on test results, we evaluated in this study dental pulp responses to pulp sensibility tests (ie, cold and electric) in patients with anxiety and depression.
Material and methods: A number of 90 people age 20 to 30 participated in the study, including 30 healthy and 60 with anxiety and depression, whose disorder was approved by a psychiatrist based on the Symptom Checklist 90-R questionnaire. Pulp sensibility tests included electric and cold ones were performed on lateral mandibular teeth. The cold test results were recorded based on the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scoring (0 no response, 10 worst pain). Electric pulp test was performed using a digital pulp tester. The lowest current that stimulated a pulp response was recorded. The data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests.
Results: The cold test pain intensity was significantly higher in patients than in healthy subjects and was significantly associated with the severity of anxiety and depression. In addition, the electric pulp test current to evoke a response was significantly lower in patients than in healthy subjects and was also significantly associated with the severity of anxiety and depression.
Conclusions: Given the limitations of this study, anxiety and depression significantly affect the results of pulp sensibility tests. Key words:Anxiety, Cold pulp test, depression, electric pulp testing.
Copyright: © 2022 Medicina Oral S.L.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest None declared.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of Pulp Sensibility Tests Responses in Type 2 Diabetes Patients and Healthy Individuals.J Endod. 2020 Mar;46(3):364-369. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.11.016. Epub 2020 Jan 17. J Endod. 2020. PMID: 31959482
-
Response to Pulp Sensibility Tests after Full Pulpotomy in Permanent Mandibular Teeth with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Retrospective Data Analysis.J Endod. 2022 Jan;48(1):80-86. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2021.10.005. Epub 2021 Oct 27. J Endod. 2022. PMID: 34715134
-
Accuracy of cold sensibility testing on teeth with full-coverage restorations: a clinical study.Int Endod J. 2021 Jul;54(7):1008-1015. doi: 10.1111/iej.13490. Epub 2021 Feb 25. Int Endod J. 2021. PMID: 33550601
-
Review of pulp sensibility tests. Part II: electric pulp tests and test cavities.Int Endod J. 2010 Nov;43(11):945-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01760.x. Epub 2010 Aug 18. Int Endod J. 2010. PMID: 20726917 Review.
-
Pulp sensibility and vitality tests for diagnosing pulpal health in permanent teeth: a critical review.Int Endod J. 2017 Feb;50(2):135-142. doi: 10.1111/iej.12611. Epub 2016 Feb 11. Int Endod J. 2017. PMID: 26789282 Review.
Cited by
-
Simulating Pulp Vitality Measurements via Digital Optical Twins: Influence of Dental Components on Spectral Transmission.Sensors (Basel). 2025 May 20;25(10):3217. doi: 10.3390/s25103217. Sensors (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40432012 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Villa-Chávez CE, Patiño-Marín N, Loyola-Rodríguez JP, Zavala-Alonso NV, Martínez-Castañón GA, Medina-Solís CE. Predictive values of thermal and electrical dental pulp tests: a clinical study. Journal of endodontics. 2013;39:965–9. - PubMed
-
- Jafarzadeh H, Abbott PV. Review of pulp sensibility tests. Part ΙΙ: electric pulp tests and test cavities. International Endodontic Journal. 2010;43:945–58. - PubMed
-
- Neves VC, Toledo BE, Camargo GA, Souza AA, Zuza EP. Determination of the influence of chronic periodontitis on pulp sensibility by means of electric and thermal cold testing. Journal of endodontics. 2017;43:1802–5. - PubMed
-
- Edwards RR, Fillingim RB, Yamauchi S, Sigurdsson A, Bunting S, Mohorn SG. Effects of gender and acute dental pain on thermal pain responses. The Clinical journal of pain. 1999;15:233–7. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources