Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec:64 Suppl 4:S4-S11.
doi: 10.1111/epi.17307. Epub 2022 Jun 6.

Diagnostic yield and limitations of in-hospital documentation in patients with epilepsy

Affiliations

Diagnostic yield and limitations of in-hospital documentation in patients with epilepsy

Andreas Schulze-Bonhage et al. Epilepsia. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the diagnostic yield of in-hospital video-electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring to document seizures in patients with epilepsy.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of electronic seizure documentation at the University Hospital Freiburg (UKF) and at King's College London (KCL). Statistical assessment of the role of the duration of monitoring, and subanalyses on presurgical patient groups and patients undergoing reduction of antiseizure medication.

Results: Of more than 4800 patients with epilepsy undergoing in-hospital recordings at the two institutions since 2005, seizures with documented for 43% (KCL) and 73% (UKF).. Duration of monitoring was highly significantly associated with seizure recordings (p < .0001), and presurgical patients as well as patients with drug reduction had a significantly higher diagnostic yield (p < .0001). Recordings with a duration of >5 days lead to additional new seizure documentation in only less than 10% of patients.

Significance: There is a need for the development of new ambulatory monitoring strategies to document seizures for diagnostic and monitoring purposes for a relevant subgroup of patients with epilepsy in whom in-hospital monitoring fails to document seizures.

Keywords: epilepsy; ictal event; in-hospital monitoring; mobile devices; seizure; video-EEG.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Andreas Schulze-Bonhage has received research support from the company UNEEG as part of a multicenter ongoing study. None of the other authors has any conflict of interest to disclose. We confirm that we have read the Journal's position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this report is consistent with those guidelines.

References

REFERENCES

    1. Alsaadi TM, Thieman C, Shatzel A, et al. Video-EEG telemetry can be a crucial tool for neurologists experienced in epilepsy when diagnosing seizure disorders. Seizure. 2004;13:32-4.
    1. Alving J, Beniczky S. Diagnostic usefulness and duration of the inpatient long-term video-EEG monitoring: findings in patients extensively investigated before the monitoring. Seizure. 2009;18:470-3.
    1. Amin U, Benbadis SR, Frontera AT Jr. Outcome of prolonged video-EEG monitoring in a new VA monitoring unit. Epilepsy Behav. 2020;102:106696.
    1. Asano E, Pawlak C, Shah A, Shah J, Luat AF, Ahn-Ewing J, et al. The diagnostic value of initial video-EEG monitoring in children--review of 1000 cases. Epilepsy Res. 2005;66:129-35.
    1. Baud MO, Schindler K, Rao VR. Under-sampling in epilepsy: limitations of conventional EEG. Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2021;6:41-9.

Publication types

Grants and funding