Apixaban vs. standard of care after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the ATLANTIS trial
- PMID: 35583186
- DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac242
Apixaban vs. standard of care after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the ATLANTIS trial
Erratum in
-
Corrigendum to: Apixaban vs. standard of care after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the ATLANTIS trial.Eur Heart J. 2022 Oct 21;43(40):4194. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac408. Eur Heart J. 2022. PMID: 35918780 No abstract available.
Abstract
Aims: The respective roles of oral anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remain debated. ATLANTIS is an international, randomized, open-label, superiority trial comparing apixaban to the standard of care.
Methods and results: After successful TAVI, 1500 patients were randomized (1:1) to receive apixaban 5 mg (2.5 mg if impaired renal function or concomitant antiplatelet therapy) (n = 749) twice daily, or standard of care (n = 751). Randomization was stratified by the need for chronic anticoagulation therapy. Standard-of-care patients received a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) (Stratum 1) or antiplatelet therapy (Stratum 2) if there was an indication for anticoagulation or not, respectively. The primary endpoint was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke or transient ischaemic attack, systemic embolism, intracardiac or bioprosthesis thrombosis, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, and life-threatening, disabling, or major bleeding over 1-year follow-up. The primary safety endpoint was major, disabling, or life-threatening bleeding. The primary outcome occurred in 138 (18.4%) and 151 (20.1%) patients receiving apixaban or standard of care, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) 0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73-1.16] and there was no evidence of interaction between treatment and stratum (Pinteraction = 0.57). The primary safety endpoint was similar in both groups (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.72-1.44). In Stratum 1 (n = 451), an exploratory analysis showed no difference for all endpoints between apixaban and VKA. In Stratum 2 (n = 1049), the primary outcome and primary safety endpoint did not differ, but obstructive valve thrombosis was reduced with apixaban vs. antiplatelet therapy (HR 0.19; 95% CI 0.08-0.46), while a signal of higher non-cardiovascular mortality was observed with apixaban.
Conclusion: After TAVI, apixaban was not superior to the standard of care, irrespective of an indication for oral anticoagulation.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02664649.
Keywords: Anticoagulation; Stroke; TAVI; Valve thrombosis.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Comment in
-
Defining optimal antithrombotic therapy post-TAVI: the contribution of ATLANTIS.Eur Heart J. 2022 Aug 1;43(29):2798-2800. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac139. Eur Heart J. 2022. PMID: 35583144 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
