Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 13;101(19):e29157.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029157.

The efficacy of cognitive behavior stress management on functional dyspepsia: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations

The efficacy of cognitive behavior stress management on functional dyspepsia: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Min Cheng et al. Medicine (Baltimore). .

Abstract

Background: Functional dyspepsia and digestive disorders are common, debilitating and costly. Little information is available about the role of stress management in terms of cognitive-behavioral treatment of dyspepsia. We performed a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of cognitive behavior stress management for the treatment of functional dyspepsia.

Methods: A comprehensive search of several databases from 1966 to March 2022 will be conducted. The databases include Ovid Medline In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid PsycINFO, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus. The primary outcome for this study was the rate of successful treatment (presence of no more than mild pain or discomfort after treatment). The secondary outcomes were improvement of dyspepsia at short-term (<1 year) and long-term (≥1 year) follow up, improvement in quality of life, and development of treatment-related adverse events. The risk of bias in each included study will be assessed utilizing the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool. The Review Manager 5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK) will be used to analyze the data.

Results: We will synthesize the current studies to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of cognitive behavior stress management on functional dyspepsia.

Conclusion: The result of this review will provide more reliable references to help clinicians make decisions when dealing with functional dyspepsia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Madisch A, Andresen V, Enck P, Labenz J, Frieling T, Schemann M. The diagnosis and treatment of functional dyspepsia. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2018;115:222–32. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Talley NJ. Functional dyspepsia: advances in diagnosis and therapy. Gut Liver 2017;11:349–57. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tack J, Camilleri M. New developments in the treatment of gastroparesis and functional dyspepsia. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2018;43:111–7. - PubMed
    1. Harer KN, Hasler WL. Functional dyspepsia: a review of the symptoms, evaluation, and treatment options. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) 2020;16:66–74. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vakil N, Wernersson B, Wissmar J, Dent J. Sleep disturbance due to heartburn and regurgitation is common in patients with functional dyspepsia. United European Gastroenterol J 2016;4:191–8. - PMC - PubMed