Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug;26(8):1622-1631.
doi: 10.1007/s10995-022-03421-6. Epub 2022 May 18.

A model to evaluate interprofessional training effectiveness: feasibility and five-year outcomes of a multi-site prospective cohort study

Affiliations

A model to evaluate interprofessional training effectiveness: feasibility and five-year outcomes of a multi-site prospective cohort study

Lauren Bishop et al. Matern Child Health J. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: Assessing the impact of interdisciplinary training programs is highly desirable and needed. However, there are currently no established methods to prospectively assess long-term outcomes of trainees compared to individuals who did not receive training. Our objective was to test the feasibility of a longitudinal, prospective cohort design to evaluate training outcomes, and to use this method to evaluate Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental Disabilities and Related Disorders (LEND) training outcomes.

Methods: LEND trainees were matched to comparison peers and followed annually for up to five years using a pre-existing outcomes survey. We assessed study feasibility using recruitment and retention data over five years. We then looked at preliminary efficacy of LEND training in LEND trainees compared to comparison peers using the pre-existing outcomes survey.

Results: Overall, 68.3% of eligible trainees participated in the Outcomes Study across five years, and 66.0% were matched to comparison peers. On average, 84.4% of LEND trainees and 79.9% of comparison peers completed the outcomes survey annually. Attrition was low at 0.9% for LEND trainees and 2.6% for comparison peers over five years. LEND training demonstrated preliminary efficacy in promoting leadership development: LEND trainees began their careers engaged in more leadership activities than comparison peers, and the rate of growth in their participation in leadership activities was greater.

Conclusions: The design used to assess outcomes is a feasible approach that can be widely used to assess training program outcomes. Analyses suggest that LEND training is efficacious in increasing involvement in leadership activities over time after graduation.

Keywords: Graduate training; Interdisciplinary training; Interprofessional training; Measurement of educational outcomes; Training outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study Participant Recruitment Cycle
Figure 2
Figure 2
Annual Survey Completion (2015–2019)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Longitudinal Change in Leadership Activities

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Association of University Centers on Disabilities (2011). About LEND. Retrieved from: https://www.aucd.org/template/page.cfm?id=473
    1. Brosco JP, Pulgaron E, Vanderbilt DL, Macias M, Mathew MS, & Blum NJ (2018). The Interprofessional/Family-Centered-Care Observation Rubric (I-FOR): Results of a multicenter study of a new measure of educational outcomes. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 22(10), 1384–1392. - PubMed
    1. Devon EP, Tenney-Soeiro R, Ronan J, & Balmer DF (2019). A pediatric pre-intern boot camp: Program development and evaluation informed by a conceptual framework. Academic Pediatrics, 19(2), 165–169. - PubMed
    1. Efstathiou N, & Walker WM (2014). Interprofessional, simulation-based training in end of life care communication: a pilot study. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 28(1), 68–70. - PubMed
    1. Fisher RJ (1993). Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(2), 303–315.

LinkOut - more resources