Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022:1357:351-375.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-88071-2_14.

Hazard Assessment of Benchmark Metal-Based Nanomaterials Through a Set of In Vitro Genotoxicity Assays

Affiliations

Hazard Assessment of Benchmark Metal-Based Nanomaterials Through a Set of In Vitro Genotoxicity Assays

Nádia Vital et al. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2022.

Erratum in

Abstract

For safety assessment of nanomaterials (NMs), in vitro genotoxicity data based on well-designed experiments is required. Metal-based NMs are amongst the most used in consumer products. In this chapter, we report results for three metal-based NMs, titanium dioxide (NM-100), cerium dioxide (NM-212) and silver (NM-302) in V79 cells, using a set of in vitro genotoxicity assays covering different endpoints: the medium-throughput comet assay and its modified version (with the enzyme formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase, Fpg), measuring DNA strand beaks (SBs) and oxidized purines, respectively; the micronucleus (MN) assay, assessing chromosomal damage; and the Hprt gene mutation test. The results generated by this test battery showed that all NMs displayed genotoxic potential. NM-100 induced DNA breaks, DNA oxidation damage and point mutations but not chromosome instability. NM-212 increased the level of DNA oxidation damage, point mutations and increased the MN frequency at the highest concentration tested. NM-302 was moderately cytotoxic and induced gene mutations, but not DNA or chromosome damage. In conclusion, the presented in vitro genotoxicity testing strategy allowed the identification of genotoxic effects caused by three different metal-based NMs, raising concern as to their impact on human health. The results support the use of this in vitro test battery for the genotoxicity assessment of NMs, reducing the use of more expensive, time-consuming and ethically demanding in vivo assays, in compliance with the 3 R's.

Keywords: Cerium dioxide; DNA damage; Genotoxicity; Mutagenicity; Nanomaterials; Silver nanorods/wires; Titanium dioxide.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bettencourt A, Gonçalves LM, Gramacho AC, Vieira A, Rolo D, Martins C et al (2020) Analysis of the characteristics and cytotoxicity of titanium dioxide nanomaterials following simulated in vitro digestion. Nano 10(8):1516. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10081516 - DOI
    1. Collins AR, Annangi B, Rubio L, Marcos R, Dorn M, Merker C et al (2017) High throughput toxicity screening and intracellular detection of nanomaterials. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 9(1):e1413. https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.1413 - DOI
    1. Doak SH, Manshian B, Jenkins GJS, Singh N (2012) In vitro genotoxicity testing strategy for nanomaterials and the adaptation of current OECD guidelines. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 745(1–2):104–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2011.09.013 - DOI
    1. Louro H, Saruga A, Santos J, Pinhão M, Silva MJ (2019) Biological impact of metal nanomaterials in relation to their physicochemical characteristics. Toxicol In Vitro 56:172–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2019.01.018 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Elespuru R, Pfuhler S, Aardema MJ, Chen T, Doak SH, Doherty A et al (2018) Genotoxicity assessment of nanomaterials: recommendations on best practices, assays, and methods. Toxicol Sci 164(2):391–416. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfy100 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources