External Validation of Three Available Grading Systems for Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma in a Single Institution Cohort
- PMID: 35583706
- DOI: 10.1007/s12022-022-09719-z
External Validation of Three Available Grading Systems for Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma in a Single Institution Cohort
Abstract
Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is a rare thyroid carcinoma with a variable clinical behavior. Potential clinical and pathological prognostic markers have been investigated, but studies are limited and controversial. In neuroendocrine neoplasms of various other sites, necrosis and proliferation (mitotic activity and/or Ki67 index) are integrated to provide a histological grade. Recently, an International Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma Grading System (IMTCGS) has been designed to define high- or low-grade MTC by combining proliferative activity and necrosis. This proposal integrates two previously published grading schemes by American (2-tiered grading, low- and high-grade MTC) and Australian authors (3-tiered grading, low-, intermediate-, and high-grade MTC). To validate the clinical role of these systems, their prognostic impact was evaluated in an independent cohort of 111 MTCs. Necrosis, which was the only parameter integrated into the 3 grading systems, proved to be individually correlate with tumor relapse, while no association was found with the proliferation (mitotic count and Ki67 index); however, by combining the different parameters according to all three grading systems, "high-grade" MTCs turned out to be significantly associated with the disease recurrence (p < 0.005) in all systems. In disease-free survival analysis, the IMTCGS stratification was the only one that demonstrated a significant impact at Cox regression analysis (p = 0.004), further confirmed by the Kaplan-Meier curves (p = 0.002). Similar findings were also reproduced when analysis was restricted to sporadic MTCs (68 cases). In conclusion, our results confirm the prognostic role of IMTCGS, supporting the importance of incorporating this information into the pathology report. However, none of the systems proved to predict the overall survival in this validation cohort.
Keywords: Grading; Medullary thyroid carcinoma; Neuroendocrine carcinoma; Prognosis.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Comment in
-
Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma in the IARC/WHO Neuroendocrine Schema.Endocr Pathol. 2022 Sep;33(3):346-347. doi: 10.1007/s12022-022-09728-y. Epub 2022 Aug 8. Endocr Pathol. 2022. PMID: 35939257 No abstract available.
References
-
- Abraham DT, Low TH, Messina M, Jackson N, Gill A, Chou AS, Delbridge L, Learoyd D, Robinson BG, Sidhu S, Sywak M (2011) Medullary thyroid carcinoma: Long-term outcomes of surgical treatment. Ann Surg Oncol 18:219–225. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1339-y - DOI - PubMed
-
- Pacini F, Castagna MG, Brilli L, Pentheroudakis G (2012) Thyroid cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 23:vii110–vii119. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mds230
-
- Van Veelen W, De Groot JWB, Acton DS, Hofstra RMW, Höppener JWM, Links TP, Lips CJM (2009) Medullary thyroid carcinoma and biomarkers: Past, present and future. J Intern Med 266:126–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2009.02106.x - DOI - PubMed
-
- Schröder S, Böcker W, Baisch H, Bürk CG, Arps H, Meiners I, Kastendieck H, Heitz PU, Klöppel G (1988) Prognostic factors in medullary thyroid carcinomas. Survival in relation to age, sex, stage, histology, immunocytochemistry, and DNA content. Cancer 61:806–16. - DOI
-
- Kebebew E, Ituarte PH, Siperstein AE, Duh QY, Clark OH (2000) Medullary thyroid carcinoma: clinical characteristics, treatment, prognostic factors, and a comparison of staging systems. Cancer 88:1139–48. - DOI
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
