Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov;32(11):7854-7864.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08803-6. Epub 2022 May 18.

Comparison of the O-RADS and ADNEX models regarding malignancy rate and validity in evaluating adnexal lesions

Affiliations

Comparison of the O-RADS and ADNEX models regarding malignancy rate and validity in evaluating adnexal lesions

Guan-Yeu Chen et al. Eur Radiol. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare the ability of the O-RADS and ADNEX models to classify benign or malignant adnexal lesions.

Methods: This retrospective single-center study included women who underwent surgery for adnexal lesions. Two gynecologists independently categorized the adnexal lesions according to the O-RADS and ADNEX models. Four additional readers were included to validate the new quick-access O-RADS flowchart.

Results: Among the 322 patients included in this study, 264 (82.0%) had a benign diagnosis, and 58 (18.0%) had a malignant diagnosis. The malignant rates of O-RADS 2, O-RADS 3, O-RADS 4, and O-RADS 5 were 0%, 3.0%, 37.7%, and 78.9%, respectively. The AUC of the O-RADS in the 322 patients was 0.93. On comparing the O-RADS and ADNEX models in the remaining 281 patients, the AUCs of the O-RADS, ADNEX model with CA125, and ADNEX model without CA125 were 0.92, 0.95, and 0.94, respectively. When setting a uniform cutoff of ≥ 10% (≥ O-RADS 4) to predict malignancy, the O-RADS had higher sensitivity than the ADNEX model (96.6% vs. 91.4%), and relatively similar specificity. In addition, the readers with the quick-access flowchart spent less time categorizing O-RADS than the readers with only the original O-RADS table (mean analysis time: 99 min 15 s vs. 111 min 55 s).

Conclusions: The O-RADS classification of the adnexal lesions as benign or malignant was comparable to that of the ADNEX model and had higher sensitivity at the 10% cutoff value. A quick-access O-RADS flowchart was helpful in O-RADS categorization and might shorten the analysis time.

Key points: • Both O-RADS and ADNEX models had good diagnostic performance in distinguishing adnexal malignancy, and O-RADS had higher sensitivity than ADNEX model in uniform 10% cutoff to predict malignancy. • Quick-access O-RADS flowchart was developed to help review O-RADS classification and might help reduce the analysis time.

Keywords: Adnexal diseases; ROC curve; Sensitivity and specificity; Ultrasonography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Gynecology (2016) Practice Bulletin No. 174: Evaluation and Management of Adnexal Masses. Obstet Gynecol 128:e210-e226
    1. Sadowski EA, Paroder V, Patel-Lippmann K et al (2018) Indeterminate adnexal cysts at US: prevalence and characteristics of ovarian cancer. Radiology 287:1041–1049 - DOI
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2020) Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 70:7–30 - DOI
    1. Timmerman D, Valentin L, Bourne TH, Collins WP, Verrelst H, Vergote I (2000) Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors: a consensus opinion from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 16:500–505 - DOI
    1. Timmerman D, Testa AC, Bourne T et al (2005) Logistic regression model to distinguish between the benign and malignant adnexal mass before surgery: a multicenter study by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Group. J Clin Oncol 23:8794–8801 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources