Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;29(46):70158-70166.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20820-y. Epub 2022 May 18.

Adsorption kinetics and equilibrium of Ni2+, Cu2+, Co2+, and Ag+ on geopolymers derived from ashes: application to treat effluents from the E-Coat printing process

Affiliations

Adsorption kinetics and equilibrium of Ni2+, Cu2+, Co2+, and Ag+ on geopolymers derived from ashes: application to treat effluents from the E-Coat printing process

Enrique C Peres et al. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Geopolymers were obtained from ashes through an alternative geopolymerization process and applied to remove Ni2+, Cu2+, Co2+, and Ag+ from synthetic aqueous media and real effluents. The study in synthetic solutions revealed that pseudo-second-order and general order models were the best to fit the kinetic curves. To represent the equilibrium curves, Langmuir and Freundlich were the most adequate. The geopolymer derived from bottom ash (GHA) was superior to adsorb Cu+2, Co+2, and Ag+1 than the geopolymer derived from fly ash (GFA). GHA reached adsorption capacities of 279.5, 288.2, and 462.8 mg g-1 for Co+2, Cu+2, and Ag+1, respectively. Otherwise, GFA was the best for Ni+2 removal, with an efficiency of 95% in low concentrations. In treating real effluents of the E-coat printing process, both GHA and GFA were efficient, with the removal of higher than 85% for all the metals. In brief, it can be stated that GFA and GHA prepared are promising materials to remove metals from aqueous media (synthetic and real), presenting fast adsorption kinetics, high adsorption capacity, and high metal removal percentage.

Keywords: Adsorption; Ash; Equilibrium Models; Geopolymers; Heavy metals.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Al-Harahsheh M, Alzboon K, Al-Makhadmeh L et al (2015) Fly ash based geopolymer for heavy metal removal: a case study on copper removal. J Environ Chem Eng 3:1669–1677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2015.06.005 - DOI
    1. Ariffin N, Abdullah MMAB, Zainol RRMA et al (2017) Geopolymer as an adsorbent of heavy metal: a review. AIP Conf Proc 1885:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5002224 - DOI
    1. Bonilla-Petriciolet A, Mendoza-Castillo DI, Reynel-Avila HE (2017) Adsorption processes for water treatment and purification. Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58136-1
    1. Cesca K, Netto MS, Ely VL et al (2020) Synthesis of spherical bacterial nanocellulose as a potential silver adsorption agent for antimicrobial purposes. Cellul Chem Technol 54:285–290. https://doi.org/10.35812/CELLULOSECHEMTECHNOL.2020.54.30 - DOI
    1. Długosz O, Banach M (2018) Kinetic, isotherm and thermodynamic investigations of the adsorption of Ag+ and Cu2+ on vermiculite. J Mol Liq 258:295–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.03.041 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources