Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep;81(3):297-309.
doi: 10.1111/his.14698. Epub 2022 May 27.

Intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm (ITPN) of the pancreas: a distinct entity among pancreatic tumors

Affiliations

Intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm (ITPN) of the pancreas: a distinct entity among pancreatic tumors

Gaetano Paolino et al. Histopathology. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Aims: Intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm (ITPN) of the pancreas is a recently recognized pancreatic tumor entity. Here we aimed to determine the most important features with a systematic review coupled with an integrated statistical approach.

Methods and results: PubMed, SCOPUS, and Embase were searched for studies reporting data on pancreatic ITPN. The clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular data were summarized. Then a comprehensive survival analysis and a comparative analysis of the molecular alterations of ITPN with those of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) from reference cohorts (including the International Cancer Genome Consortium- ICGC dataset and The Cancer Genome Atlas, TCGA program) were conducted. The core findings of 128 patients were as follows: (i) Clinicopathological parameters: pancreatic head is the most common site; presence of an associated adenocarcinoma was reported in 60% of cases, but with rare nodal metastasis. (ii) Immunohistochemistry: MUC1 (>90%) and MUC6 (70%) were the most frequently expressed mucins. ITPN lacked the intestinal marker MUC2; unlike IPMN, it did not express MUC5AC. (iii) Molecular landscape: Compared with PDAC/IPMN, the classic pancreatic drivers KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A, SMAD4, GNAS, and RNF43 were less altered in ITPN (P < 0.001), whereas MCL amplifications, FGFR2 fusions, and PI3KCA mutations were commonly altered (P < 0.001). (iv) Survival analysis: ITPN with a "pure" branch duct involvement showed the lowest risk of recurrence.

Conclusion: ITPN is a distinct pancreatic neoplasm with specific clinicopathological and molecular characteristics. Its recognition is fundamental for its clinical/prognostic implications and for the enrichment of potential targets for precision oncology.

Keywords: IPMN; ITPN; PDAC; intraductal; pancreas; pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; tubulopapillary.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest to report.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Typical histology of pancreatic ITPN with an associated invasive adenocarcinoma. (A) Low‐magnification image for appreciating the different types of architecture that can be encountered in ITPN: the black arrow indicates the tubular architecture, which is generally predominant, the black triangle indicates the papillary component, which is not a constant presence in this type of lesion, and the asterisk indicates the infiltrative component (hematoxylin–eosin, 4× original magnification). (B,C,D) Higher magnification of the tubular (B), of the papillary (C), and of the infiltrative (D) components (hematoxylin–eosin, 10 × original magnification). [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 2
Figure 2
Classical immunohistochemical patterns of mucins expression in pancreatic ITPN (10× original magnification). (A) MUC1: this is the mucin more often expressed by pancreatic ITPN. (B) MUC6: this is another mucin very often expressed by pancreatic ITPN, sometimes it appears more focal. (C) MUC5AC: it is usually negative in ITPN, different from IPMN. (D) MUC2: it is usually negative in ITPN, different from intestinal IPMN. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan–Meier curve regarding disease‐free survival of patients with pancreatic ITPN based on the different pattern of ductal tree involvement. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 4
Figure 4
Typical appearance of a case of pancreatic ITPN, showing solid and solid/cystic areas (A: solid/cystic appearance at gross sampling, B: solid and solid/cystic appearance at imaging: CT scan, where the lesion is indicated by a yellow arrow). [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021; 71; 209–249. - PubMed
    1. Mizrahi JD, Surana R, Valle JW et al. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet 2020; 395; 2008–2020. - PubMed
    1. Singhi AD, Wood LD. Early detection of pancreatic cancer using DNA‐based molecular approaches. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021; 18; 457–468. - PubMed
    1. Kim JY, Hong S‐M. Precursor lesions of pancreatic cancer. Oncol. Res. Treat. 2018; 41; 603–610. - PubMed
    1. Riva G, Pea A, Pilati C et al. Histo‐molecular oncogenesis of pancreatic cancer: from precancerous lesions to invasive ductal adenocarcinoma. World J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2018; 10; 317–327. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms