Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug;130(8):630-639.
doi: 10.1002/cncy.22595. Epub 2022 May 18.

Evaluating the role of Z-stack to improve the morphologic evaluation of urine cytology whole slide images for high-grade urothelial carcinoma: Results and review of a pilot study

Affiliations
Free article

Evaluating the role of Z-stack to improve the morphologic evaluation of urine cytology whole slide images for high-grade urothelial carcinoma: Results and review of a pilot study

David Kim et al. Cancer Cytopathol. 2022 Aug.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Whole slide imaging (WSI) adoption has been slower in cytopathology due, in part, to challenges in multifocal plane scanning on 3-dimensional cell clusters. ThinPrep and other liquid-based preparations may alleviate the issue by reducing clusters in a concentrated area. This study investigates the use of Z-stacked images for diagnostic assessment and the experience of evaluating urine ThinPrep WSI.

Methods: Thirty ThinPrep urine cases of high-grade urothelial carcinoma (n = 22) and cases of negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (n = 8) were included. Slides were scanned at 40× magnification without Z-stack and with Z-stack at 3 layers, 1 μm each. Six cytopathologists and 1 cytotechnologist evaluated the cases in 2 rounds with a 2-week wash-out period in a blinded manner. A Cohen's Kappa (CK) calculated concordance rates. A survey after each round evaluated participant experience.

Results: CK with the original report ranged from 0.606 to 1.0 (P < .05) without Z-stack and 0.533 to 1.0 (P < .05) with Z-stack both indicating substantial-to-perfect concordance. For both rounds, interobserver CK was moderate-to-perfect (0.417-1.0, P < .05). Intraobserver CK was 0.697-1.0 (P < 0.05), indicating substantial to perfect concordance. The average scan time and file size for slides without Z-stack and with Z-stack are 6.27 minute/0.827 GB and 14.06 minute/2.650 GB, respectively. Surveys demonstrated a range in comfort and use with slightly more favorable opinions for Z-stacked cases.

Conclusions: Z-stack images provide minimal diagnostic benefit for urine ThinPrep WSI. In addition, Z-stacked urine WSI does not justify the prolonged scan times and larger storage needs compared to those without Z-stack.

Keywords: The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology; ThinPrep; Z-stack; digital cytology; urine cytology; urothelial carcinoma; whole slide images.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Ho J, Parwani A V, Jukic DM, Yagi Y, Anthony L, Gilbertson JR. Use of whole slide imaging in surgical pathology quality assurance: design and pilot validation studies. Hum Pathol. 2006;37:322-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2005.11.005
    1. Evans AJ, Depeiza N, Allen SG, Fraser K, Shirley S, Chetty R. Use of whole slide imaging (WSI) for distance teaching. J Clin Pathol. 2021;74:425-428. https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2020-206763
    1. Mosquera-Zamudio A, Hanna MG, Parra-Medina R, Piedrahita AC, Rodriguez-Urrego PA, Pantanowitz L. Advantage of Z-stacking for teleconsultation between the USA and Colombia. Diagn Cytopathol. 2019;47:35-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.23992
    1. Retamero JA, Aneiros-Fernandez J, del Moral RG. Complete digital pathology for routine histopathology diagnosis in a multicenter hospital network. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020;144:221-228. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2018-0541-OA
    1. Fraggetta F, Garozzo S, Zannoni G, Pantanowitz L, Rossi E. Routine digital pathology workflow: the Catania experience. J Pathol Inform. 2017;8:51. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_58_17

MeSH terms