Evaluating the role of Z-stack to improve the morphologic evaluation of urine cytology whole slide images for high-grade urothelial carcinoma: Results and review of a pilot study
- PMID: 35584402
- DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22595
Evaluating the role of Z-stack to improve the morphologic evaluation of urine cytology whole slide images for high-grade urothelial carcinoma: Results and review of a pilot study
Abstract
Background: Whole slide imaging (WSI) adoption has been slower in cytopathology due, in part, to challenges in multifocal plane scanning on 3-dimensional cell clusters. ThinPrep and other liquid-based preparations may alleviate the issue by reducing clusters in a concentrated area. This study investigates the use of Z-stacked images for diagnostic assessment and the experience of evaluating urine ThinPrep WSI.
Methods: Thirty ThinPrep urine cases of high-grade urothelial carcinoma (n = 22) and cases of negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (n = 8) were included. Slides were scanned at 40× magnification without Z-stack and with Z-stack at 3 layers, 1 μm each. Six cytopathologists and 1 cytotechnologist evaluated the cases in 2 rounds with a 2-week wash-out period in a blinded manner. A Cohen's Kappa (CK) calculated concordance rates. A survey after each round evaluated participant experience.
Results: CK with the original report ranged from 0.606 to 1.0 (P < .05) without Z-stack and 0.533 to 1.0 (P < .05) with Z-stack both indicating substantial-to-perfect concordance. For both rounds, interobserver CK was moderate-to-perfect (0.417-1.0, P < .05). Intraobserver CK was 0.697-1.0 (P < 0.05), indicating substantial to perfect concordance. The average scan time and file size for slides without Z-stack and with Z-stack are 6.27 minute/0.827 GB and 14.06 minute/2.650 GB, respectively. Surveys demonstrated a range in comfort and use with slightly more favorable opinions for Z-stacked cases.
Conclusions: Z-stack images provide minimal diagnostic benefit for urine ThinPrep WSI. In addition, Z-stacked urine WSI does not justify the prolonged scan times and larger storage needs compared to those without Z-stack.
Keywords: The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology; ThinPrep; Z-stack; digital cytology; urine cytology; urothelial carcinoma; whole slide images.
© 2022 American Cancer Society.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Ho J, Parwani A V, Jukic DM, Yagi Y, Anthony L, Gilbertson JR. Use of whole slide imaging in surgical pathology quality assurance: design and pilot validation studies. Hum Pathol. 2006;37:322-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2005.11.005
-
- Evans AJ, Depeiza N, Allen SG, Fraser K, Shirley S, Chetty R. Use of whole slide imaging (WSI) for distance teaching. J Clin Pathol. 2021;74:425-428. https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2020-206763
-
- Mosquera-Zamudio A, Hanna MG, Parra-Medina R, Piedrahita AC, Rodriguez-Urrego PA, Pantanowitz L. Advantage of Z-stacking for teleconsultation between the USA and Colombia. Diagn Cytopathol. 2019;47:35-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.23992
-
- Retamero JA, Aneiros-Fernandez J, del Moral RG. Complete digital pathology for routine histopathology diagnosis in a multicenter hospital network. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020;144:221-228. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2018-0541-OA
-
- Fraggetta F, Garozzo S, Zannoni G, Pantanowitz L, Rossi E. Routine digital pathology workflow: the Catania experience. J Pathol Inform. 2017;8:51. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_58_17
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
