Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 11;75(6):e20210804.
doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0804. eCollection 2022.

Blood pressure variability in individuals with diabetes mellitus: a scoping review

[Article in English, Portuguese]
Antonia Fabiana Rodrigues da Silva  1 , Rebeca Chaves Cruz  1 , Nila Larisse Silva de Albuquerque  2 , Viviane Martins da Silva  1 , Thelma Leite de Araujo  1
Affiliations

Blood pressure variability in individuals with diabetes mellitus: a scoping review

[Article in English, Portuguese]
Antonia Fabiana Rodrigues da Silva et al. Rev Bras Enferm. .

Abstract
in English, Portuguese, Spanish

Objectives: to map methods and devices used to assess very short-, short-, medium-, and long-term pressure variability in adults with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus.

Methods: scoping review conducted in January and February 2021 in MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, LILACS, PubMed, and Embase databases. Studies conducted within the last ten years analyzing pressure variability in adult and older patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 or 2 were included. Studies that used discontinued devices were excluded.

Results: the sample was composed of 25 articles published since 2017, with the majority developed in Japan (n=11); with the predominance of the oscillometric method (n=22); the most used devices were from the Omron® brand (n=14); the most detected type was long-term variability (n=10).

Conclusions: we observed the increasing application of the oscillometric method for pressure variability analysis with various brands and models of automatic devices.

Objetivos:: mapear métodos e dispositivos utilizados para avaliação da variabilidade pressórica de curtíssimo, curto, médio e longo prazo em adultos com diabetes mellitus tipo 1 ou 2.

Métodos:: revisão de escopo realizada nos meses de janeiro e fevereiro de 2021 nas bases de dados MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, LILACS, PubMed e Embase. Incluíram-se estudos, realizados nos últimos dez anos, que analisaram a variabilidade pressórica em pacientes adultos e idosos com diabetes mellitus tipo 1 ou 2. Excluíram-se estudos que utilizaram dispositivos descontinuados.

Resultados:: a amostra foi composta por 25 artigos, publicados a partir de 2017, com maioria desenvolvida no Japão (n=11); predominância do método oscilométrico (n=22); os dispositivos mais utilizados foram da marca Omron® (n=14); o tipo de variabilidade mais detectada foi a de longo prazo (n=10). Conclusões: observou-se o crescente uso do método oscilométrico para análise da variabilidade pressórica, apresentando variedade de marcas e modelos de dispositivos automáticos.

Objetivos:: mapear métodos y dispositivos utilizados para evaluación de la variabilidad presórica de cortísimo, corto, mediano y largo plazo en adultos con diabetes mellitus tipo 1 o 2.

Métodos:: revisión del área realizada en enero y febrero de 2021 en las bases de datos MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, LILACS, PubMed y Embase. Incluidos estudios, realizados en los últimos diez años, que analizaron la variabilidad presórica en pacientes adultos y ancianos con diabetes mellitus tipo 1 o 2. Excluidos estudios que utilizaron dispositivos descontinuados.

Resultados:: la muestra fue compuesta por 25 artículos, publicados desde 2017, con mayoría desarrollada en Japón (n=11); predominancia del método oscilométrico (n=22); los dispositivos más utilizados fueron de la marca Omron® (n=14); el tipo de variabilidad más detectada fue la de largo plazo (n=10).

Conclusiones:: observado el creciente uso del método oscilométrico para análisis de la variabilidad presórica, presentando variedad de marcas y modelos de dispositivos automáticos.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. PRISMA Flowchart for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) obtained from the literature search
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Stergiou GS, Parati G, Vlachopoulos C, Achimastos A, Andreadis E, Asmar R, et al. Methodology and technology for peripheral and central blood pressure and blood pressure variability measurement: current status and future directions - Position statement of the European Society of Hypertension Working Group on blood pressure monitoring and cardiovascular variability. J Hypertens. 2016;34(9):1665–1677. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000969. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu J, Ou Y, Yan BP, Sodini C, Zhao N. Comparisons of Oscillometric Blood Pressure Measurements at Different Sites of the Upper Limb. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2018;2018:1168–1171. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2018.8512349. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kochetkov AI, Ostroumova OD, Borisova EV, Piksina GF. Mechanisms for the Development of Blood Pressure Variability and the Potential of Antihypertensive Drugs in Their Correction. Kardiologiia. 2019;59(11):56–65. doi: 10.18087/cardio.2019.11.n803. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Parati G, Stergiou GS, Dolan E, Bilo G. Blood pressure variability: clinical relevance and application. J Clin Hypertens. 2018;20:1133–1137. doi: 10.1111/jch.13304. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spallone V. Blood Pressure Variability and Autonomic Dysfunction. Curr Diab Rep. 2018;18(12):137–137. doi: 10.1007/s11892-018-1108-z. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types