Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1987;113(2):145-50.
doi: 10.1007/BF00391436.

Differential effects of 4-iodopyrazole and 3-methylpyrazole on the metabolic activation of methylazoxymethanol to a DNA methylating species by rat liver and rat colon mucosa in vivo

Differential effects of 4-iodopyrazole and 3-methylpyrazole on the metabolic activation of methylazoxymethanol to a DNA methylating species by rat liver and rat colon mucosa in vivo

E S Fiala et al. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1987.

Abstract

Using a hybrid ion-exchange reverse phase HPLC system, we found that F344 rat liver microsomes, in the presence of an NADPH-generating system, can metabolize methylazoxymethanol (MAM), a colon and liver carcinogen, to methanol and formic acid. This is in contrast to the spontaneous decomposition of MAM which yields methanol and formaldehyde. The metabolism of MAM by rat liver microsomes is sensitive to inhibition by carbon monoxide as well as to inhibition by 3-methylpyrazole (3-MeP) and 4-iodopyrazole (4-IP), with 4-IP being more potent in this respect than 3-MeP. Pretreatment of rats with 4-IP decreased the level of MAM acetate-induced DNA methylation in both the liver and the colon mucosa. In contrast, pretreatment with 3-MeP decreased MAM acetate-induced liver DNA methylation, but increased DNA methylation in the colon mucosa. This differential effect of the two compounds on DNA methylation in the liver and the colon suggests that different enzymes are responsible for activation of the carcinogen in the two organs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cornell NW (1983) Properties of alcohol dehydrogenase and ethanol oxidation in vivo and in hepatocytes. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 18:215–221 - PubMed
    1. Dauod AH, Irving CC (1977) Methylation of DNA in rat liver and intestine by dimethylnitrosamine and N-methylnitrosourea. Chem Biol Interact 16:135–143 - PubMed
    1. Deschner EE, Long FC, Hakissian M, Cupo SH (1984) Differential susceptibility of inbred mouse strains forecast by acute colonic proliferative response to methylazoxymethanol. J Natl Cancer Inst 72:195–198 - PubMed
    1. Druckrey H (1973) Specific carcinogenic and teratogenic effects of “indirect” alkylating methyl and ethyl compounds and their dependency on stages of ontogenic developments. Xenobiotica 3:271–303
    1. Feinberg A, Zedeck MS (1980) Production of a highly reactive alkylating agent from the organospecific carcinogen methylazoxy-methanol by alcohol dehydrogenase. Cancer Res 40:4446–4450 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources