Jumping through the hoops: Barriers and other ethical concerns regarding the use of psychiatric electroceutical interventions
- PMID: 35584563
- PMCID: PMC10516532
- DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114612
Jumping through the hoops: Barriers and other ethical concerns regarding the use of psychiatric electroceutical interventions
Abstract
Stakeholders' perceptions of barriers to and other ethical concerns about using psychiatric electroceutical interventions (PEIs), interventions that use electrical or magnetic stimuli to treat psychiatric conditions like treatment-resistant depression (TRD), may influence the uptake of these interventions. This study examined such perceptions among psychiatrists, patients with depression, and members of the public. We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 16 members of each group to examine their views on practical barriers and ethical concerns. We used qualitative content analysis to identify relevant themes, and compared findings across stakeholder groups. Access limitations to the interventions, including cost and availability of the interventions, cut across all PEIs-including those that are still experimental, and were raised by all groups. Most participants across all groups raised concerns about informed consent, in terms of receiving adequate, appropriate, and understandable information. Our results suggest that these three stakeholder groups perceive similar structural and attitudinal barriers to, and have similar ethical concerns about, using PEIs for TRD. These results identify key issues that must be addressed for the full potential of PEIs to be realized. Future research with larger samples will help to better understand how to address these barriers to treatment for individuals with TRD.
Keywords: Barriers; Depression; Ethical issues; Psychiatric electroceutical interventions.
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Stakeholders' Ethical Concerns Regarding Psychiatric Electroceutical Interventions: Results from a US Nationwide Survey.AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2024;15(1):11-21. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2023.2224592. Epub 2023 Jun 21. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2024. PMID: 37343219 Free PMC article.
-
Is the Treatment Worse than the Disease?: Key Stakeholders' Views about the Use of Psychiatric Electroceutical Interventions for Treatment-Resistant Depression.Neuroethics. 2025;18(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s12152-024-09573-2. Epub 2024 Oct 16. Neuroethics. 2025. PMID: 40313710 Free PMC article.
-
Last Resort Interventions?: A Qualitative Study of Psychiatrists' Experience with and Views on Psychiatric Electroceutical Interventions.Psychiatr Q. 2021 Jun;92(2):419-430. doi: 10.1007/s11126-020-09819-1. Psychiatr Q. 2021. PMID: 32789719 Free PMC article.
-
Implementation of Electronic Informed Consent in Biomedical Research and Stakeholders' Perspectives: Systematic Review.J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 8;22(10):e19129. doi: 10.2196/19129. J Med Internet Res. 2020. PMID: 33030440 Free PMC article.
-
Psychiatric Interventions in Virtual Reality: Why We Need an Ethical Framework.Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2020 Oct;29(4):574-584. doi: 10.1017/S0963180120000328. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2020. PMID: 32892774 Review.
Cited by
-
Advances in Deep Brain Stimulation: From Mechanisms to Applications.J Neurosci. 2023 Nov 8;43(45):7575-7586. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1427-23.2023. J Neurosci. 2023. PMID: 37940596 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Looking through the lens of stigma: Understanding and anticipating concerns about the responsible development and use of psychiatric electroceutical interventions (PEIs).SSM Ment Health. 2023 Dec 15;4:100261. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmmh.2023.100261. Epub 2023 Sep 6. SSM Ment Health. 2023. PMID: 38188866 Free PMC article.
-
Consensus review and considerations on TMS to treat depression: A comprehensive update endorsed by the National Network of Depression Centers, the Clinical TMS Society, and the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology.Clin Neurophysiol. 2025 Feb;170:206-233. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.12.015. Epub 2024 Dec 19. Clin Neurophysiol. 2025. PMID: 39756350 Review.
-
Stakeholders' Ethical Concerns Regarding Psychiatric Electroceutical Interventions: Results from a US Nationwide Survey.AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2024;15(1):11-21. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2023.2224592. Epub 2023 Jun 21. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2024. PMID: 37343219 Free PMC article.
-
Defining a Neurostimulation-Focused Subspecialty: Perspectives Inspired by a Debate at the 2023 Clinical TMS Society Annual Meeting.Acad Psychiatry. 2024 Oct;48(5):463-470. doi: 10.1007/s40596-024-02025-2. Epub 2024 Aug 15. Acad Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 39148002 No abstract available.
References
-
- ACGME, 2019. ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Psychiatry 1–63.
-
- American Psychiatric Association, 2010. Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder. APA. - PubMed
-
- Andrade LH, Alonso J, Mneimneh Z, Wells JE, Al-Hamzawi A, Borges G, Bromet E, Bruffaerts R, de Girolamo G, de Graaf R, Florescu S, Gureje O, Hinkov HR, Hu C, Huang Y, Hwang I, Jin R, Karam EG, Kovess-Masfety V, Levinson D, Matschinger H, O’Neill S, Posada-Villa J, Sagar R, Sampson NA, Sasu C, Stein DJ, Takeshima T, Viana MC, Xavier M, Kessler RC, 2013. Barriers to mental health treatment: results from the WHO World Mental Health surveys. Psychol. Med. 44, 1303–1317. doi:10.1017/S0033291713001943 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- APA. 2001. The Practice of Electroconvulsive Therapy: Recommendations for Treatment, Training, and Privileging: A Task Force Report of the American Psychiatric Association, 2nd ed.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical