Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;605(7910):440-446.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04572-w. Epub 2022 May 18.

Direct observation of the dead-cone effect in quantum chromodynamics

Collaborators

Direct observation of the dead-cone effect in quantum chromodynamics

ALICE Collaboration. Nature. 2022 May.

Erratum in

Abstract

In particle collider experiments, elementary particle interactions with large momentum transfer produce quarks and gluons (known as partons) whose evolution is governed by the strong force, as described by the theory of quantum chromodynamics (QCD)1. These partons subsequently emit further partons in a process that can be described as a parton shower2, which culminates in the formation of detectable hadrons. Studying the pattern of the parton shower is one of the key experimental tools for testing QCD. This pattern is expected to depend on the mass of the initiating parton, through a phenomenon known as the dead-cone effect, which predicts a suppression of the gluon spectrum emitted by a heavy quark of mass mQ and energy E, within a cone of angular size mQ/E around the emitter3. Previously, a direct observation of the dead-cone effect in QCD had not been possible, owing to the challenge of reconstructing the cascading quarks and gluons from the experimentally accessible hadrons. We report the direct observation of the QCD dead cone by using new iterative declustering techniques4,5 to reconstruct the parton shower of charm quarks. This result confirms a fundamental feature of QCD. Furthermore, the measurement of a dead-cone angle constitutes a direct experimental observation of the non-zero mass of the charm quark, which is a fundamental constant in the standard model of particle physics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Reconstruction of the showering quark.
A sketch detailing the reconstruction of the showering charm quark, using iterative declustering, is presented. The top panels show the initial reclustering procedure with the C/A algorithm, in which the particles separated by the smallest angles are brought together first. Once the reclustering is complete, the declustering procedure is carried out by unwinding the reclustering history. Each splitting node is numbered according to the declustering step in which it is reconstructed. With each splitting, the charm-quark energy, ERadiator,n, is reduced and the gluon is emitted at a smaller angle, θn, with respect to previous emissions. The mass of the heavy quark, mQ, remains constant throughout the showering process. At each splitting, gluon emissions are suppressed in the dead-cone region (shown by a red cone for the last splitting), which increases in angle as the quark energy decreases throughout the shower.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Ratios of splitting angle probability distributions.
The ratios of the splitting-angle probability distributions for D0-meson tagged jets to inclusive jets, R(θ), measured in proton–proton collisions at s=13 TeV, are shown for 5 < ERadiator < 10 GeV (left panel), 10 < ERadiator < 20 GeV (middle panel) and 20 < ERadiator < 35 GeV (right panel). The data are compared with PYTHIA v.8 and SHERPA simulations, including the no dead-cone limit given by the ratio of the angular distributions for light-quark jets (LQ) to inclusive jets. The pink shaded areas correspond to the angles within which emissions are suppressed by the dead-cone effect, assuming a charm-quark mass of 1.275 GeV/c2.

References

    1. Particle Data Group Collaboration. Zyla PA, et al. Review of particle physics. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020;2020:083C01. doi: 10.1093/ptep/ptaa104. - DOI
    1. Buckley A, et al. General-purpose event generators for LHC physics. Phys. Rep. 2011;504,:145–233. doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2011.03.005. - DOI
    1. Dokshitzer YL, Khoze VA, Troian SI. On specific QCD properties of heavy quark fragmentation (‘dead cone’) J. Phys. G. 1991;17,:1602–1604. doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/17/10/023. - DOI
    1. Frye C, Larkoski AJ, Thaler J, Zhou K. Casimir meets Poisson: improved quark/gluon discrimination with counting observables. J. High Energy Phys. 2017;9:083. doi: 10.1007/JHEP09(2017)083. - DOI
    1. Dreyer FA, Salam GP, Soyez G. The Lund jet plane. J. High Energy Phys. 2018;12:064. doi: 10.1007/JHEP12(2018)064. - DOI

Publication types