Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 18;22(1):670.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07984-6.

Are cesarean deliveries equitable in India: assessment using benefit incidence analysis

Rajeev Ranjan Singh  1 , Suyash Mishra  2 , Sanjay K Mohanty  3
Affiliations

Are cesarean deliveries equitable in India: assessment using benefit incidence analysis

Rajeev Ranjan Singh et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: In the last two decades, cesarean section (CS) deliveries in India have increased by six-fold and created economic hardship for families and households. Although several schemes and policies under the National Health Mission (NHM) have reduced the inequality in the use of maternal care services in India, the distributive effect of public health subsidies on CS deliveries remains unclear. In this context, this paper examines the usage patterns of CS delivery and estimates the share of public health subsidies on CS deliveries among mothers by different background characteristics in India.

Data: Data from the fourth round of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4) was used for the study. Out-of-pocket (OOP) payment for CS delivery was used as a dependent variable and was analyzed by level of care that is, primary (PHC, UHC, other) and secondary (government/municipal, rural hospital). Descriptive statistics, binary logistic regression, benefit incidence analysis, concentration curve and concentration index were used for the analysis.

Results: A strong economic gradient was observed in the utilization of CS delivery from public health facilities. Among mothers using any public health facility, 23% from the richest quintile did not pay for CS delivery compared to 13% from the poorest quintile. The use of the public subsidy among mothers using any type of public health facility for CS delivery was pro-rich in nature; 9% in the poorest quintile, 16.1% in the poorer, 24.5% in the middle, 27.5% among richer and 23% in the richest quintile. The pattern of utilization and distribution of public subsidy was similar across the primary and secondary health facilities but the magnitude varied. The findings from the benefit-incidence analysis are supported by those obtained from the inequality analysis. The concentration index of CS was 0.124 for public health centers and 0.291 for private health centers. The extent of inequality in the use of CS delivery in public health centers was highest in the state of Mizoram (0.436), followed by Assam (0.336), and the lowest in Tamil Nadu (0.060), followed by Kerala (0.066).

Conclusion: The utilization of CS services from public health centers in India is pro-rich. Periodically monitoring and evaluating of the cash incentive schemes for CS delivery and generating awareness among the poor would increase the use of CS delivery services in public health centers and reduce the inequality in CS delivery in India.

Keywords: Benefit Incidence Analysis; Cesarean delivery; Equity; India; Inequality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they do not have any competing interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Conceptual framework on effect of public investment on maternal care
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Percent distribution of normal and cesarean delivery in public health facility by wealth quintile in India 2015–16
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Concentration curve for mothers availing cesarean delivery in public and private health facility in India, 2015–16
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Concentration index of cesarean delivery by type of health facility in selected states of India, 2015–16
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. World Health Organization. Caesarean section rates continue to rise, amid growing inequalities in access. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/16-06-2021-caesarean-section-rates-continu...
    1. Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, Barros AJ, Barros FC, Juan L, Moller AB, Say L, Hosseinpoor AR, Yi M, Neto DD. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. The Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1341–1348. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sobhy S, Arroyo-Manzano D, Murugesu N, Karthikeyan G, Kumar V, Kaur I, Thangaratinam S. Maternal and perinatal mortality and complications associated with caesarean section in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet. 2019;393(10184):1973–1982. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32386-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Deaths from caesarean sections 100 times higher in developing countries: global study. 2019. Available from: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/death-from-caesarean-sections/en
    1. Endalifer ML, Diress G, Almaw H, Endalifer BL. Effect of overweight/obesity on caesarean section occurrence among reproductive-aged women in Ethiopia: a secondary data analysis. BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health. 2021;4(1):111. - PMC - PubMed