Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 9:13:229-241.
doi: 10.2147/JBM.S354526. eCollection 2022.

Comorbidities, Health-Related Quality of Life, Health-care Utilization in Older Persons with Hemophilia-Hematology Utilization Group Study Part VII (HUGS VII)

Affiliations

Comorbidities, Health-Related Quality of Life, Health-care Utilization in Older Persons with Hemophilia-Hematology Utilization Group Study Part VII (HUGS VII)

Randall Curtis et al. J Blood Med. .

Abstract

Purpose: We compare the impact of hemophilia on comorbidities, joint problems, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and health-care utilization between two age groups: 40-49 years and ≥50 years.

Patients and methods: The HUGS VII study recruited persons with hemophilia A or B age ≥40 years. Participants completed surveys to collect data on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, hemophilia treatment regimen, pain, joint problems, comorbidities, HRQoL, depression and anxiety, at baseline and 6-months later. Clinical chart reviews documented hemophilic severity and treatment.

Results: The sample includes 69 males, 65.2% aged ≥50 years, 75.4% with hemophilia A. Individuals ≥50 years were more likely to have mild or moderate hemophilia (68.9% vs 41.7%, P = 0.03) than those 40-49 years old. Among persons with mild/moderate hemophilia, those ≥50 years old reported a higher rate of joint pain (83.9% vs 70.0%, P = 0.34 at baseline, 91.3% vs 57.1%, P = 0.06 at follow up) or range of motion limitation (73.3% vs 60.0%, P = 0.43 at baseline, 73.9% vs 28.6%, P = 0.04 at follow up) than the younger group. Compared to the younger group, the older group reported fewer emergency room visits (4.5% vs 21.7%, P = 0.03), and physical therapy visits (15.9% vs 43.5%, P = 0.01) at baseline. The sample depression rate was 85.7%, but the differences among the age groups were not significant. The mean covariate-adjusted EQ-5D index score was lower in older persons (0.77 vs 0.89, P = 0.02).

Conclusion: Older persons with hemophilia in this sample are over-represented by individuals with mild/moderate disease, potentially due to premature death among those with severe disease. Although this group included a larger proportion of individuals with mild disease than the younger group, they experienced lower quality of life, more comorbidities both of aging and of hemophilic arthropathy, and lower rates of health-care utilization.

Keywords: aging in hemophilia; burden of hemophilia; hemophilia A; hemophilia B.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Randall Curtis received a consultant fee from USC through the project funding provided by Pfizer. He also received consultant fee from Bayer, Patient Outcomes Research Group and Novo Nordisk. Marilyn Manco-Johnson reports grants from HRSA/MCHB. Barbara A. Konkle, MD, has received grant funding from Pfizer, Regeneron, Spark, Sangamo, Sanofi, Sigilon, Takeda and Uniqure and has received consulting fees from BioMarin, CSL Behring, Pfizer and Sigilon. Roshni Kulkarni, 1) Advisory boards: Bioverativ/Sanofi, BPL, Genentech, Kedrion, Novo Nordisk, Octapharma, Pfizer, Takeda, Catalyst Bioscience Bayer; 2) Clinical Trials: Sanofi/Bioverativ, Bayer, Biomarin, Shire/Takeda, Novo Nordisk, Freeline; 3) Speakers bureau, stocks or shares: none. Joanne Wu received financial support through the project funding provided by Pfizer. Judith Baker, Megan Ullman have no significant conflicts of interest to declare. Duc Quang Tran Jr received consultant fees from Bayer, Bioverativ, HEMA Biologics, UniQure, Novo Nordisk, and Takeda. Michael B. Nichol is the principal investigator for the HUGS research group and has received grant funding from multiple sources including Pfizer, Genentech Inc., Shire (formerly Takeda/Baxter), Octapharma, CSL Behring, and Global Blood Therapeutics. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Soucie JM, Evatt B, Jackson D. Occurrence of hemophilia in the United States. The hemophilia surveillance system project investigators. Am J Hematol. 1998;59(4):288–294. PMID: 9840909. doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-8652(199812)59:4<288::aid-ajh4>3.0.co;2-i - DOI - PubMed
    1. Globe DR, Curtis RG, Koerper MA; HUGS Steering Committee. Utilization of care in haemophilia: a resource-based method for cost analysis from the Haemophilia Utilization Group Study (HUGS). Haemophilia. 2004;10(Suppl 1):63–70. PMID: 14987251. doi:10.1111/j.1355-0691.2004.00881.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Choinière M, Melzack R. Acute and chronic pain in hemophilia. Pain. 1987;31(3):317–331. doi:10.1016/0304-3959(87 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Poon JL, Zhou ZY, Doctor JN, et al. Quality of life in haemophilia A: hemophilia Utilization Group Study Va (HUGS-Va). Haemophilia. 2012;18(5):699–707; PMID: 22507546. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2012.02791.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khleif AA, Rodriguez N, Brown D, Escobar MA. Multiple comorbid conditions among middle-aged and elderly hemophilia patients: prevalence estimates and implications for future care. J Aging Res. 2011;2011:985703. doi:10.4061/2011/985703 - DOI - PMC - PubMed