Basic Medical Sciences Knowledge Retention for Clinical Practice
- PMID: 35586443
- PMCID: PMC9109985
- DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S364631
Basic Medical Sciences Knowledge Retention for Clinical Practice
Abstract
Background: The basis for studying the clinical sciences is the recall and comprehension of basic medical science facts. Do not, however, directly alter clinical information and as studies revealed that there are basic sciences knowledge retention of medical students gaps in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to assess medical students' basic medical sciences knowledge retention and a relevance of basic sciences knowledge for clinical for practice.
Methods: An institutional-based descriptive cross-section epidemiological study design was carried out in the University of Gondar from April to May of 2021. A total of 15 basic and clinical sets of questions were used for data collection. The data were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 20 to analyze data.
Results: A total of 191 medical students participated with response rate of 100%. Of these, 48.6% were male. Of all participant students, 69 (36.1%) have had the academic status of excellent with a commutative grade point average greater that 3.6 out of 4.0. Students who correctly responded for all categories of questions for basic and clinical sciences were 8.6±2.7 and 5±2.8 of second years, 5.5±2.3 and 7.1±1.2 of fourth years, 6.5±1.4 and 6.7±1.0 of fifth years, 5.3±0.8 and 8.4±2.5 of sixth years, respectively. As a representative year, the score of second year students' performance for the basic sciences is a statistically significant with overall impact of the basic sciences (6.49±2.5, F=12.51, P≤0.001) and clinical sciences (4.0±1.9, F=14.73, P≤0.001).
Conclusion: It is proposed that basic sciences knowledge should be aligned with clinical sciences preparation so that students may grasp disease diagnosis and treatment concepts in an integrated manner.
Keywords: basic sciences; clinical sciences; knowledge retention; medical students.
© 2022 Goshu.
Conflict of interest statement
The author reports no conflicts of interest in this work.
Figures





Similar articles
-
A systematic review of medical practitioners' retention and application of basic sciences to clinical practice.BMC Med Educ. 2024 Sep 13;24(1):997. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05952-8. BMC Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 39272053 Free PMC article.
-
A study of the academic performance of medical students in the comprehensive examination of the basic sciences according to the indices of emotional intelligence and educational status.J Educ Health Promot. 2015 Aug 6;4:66. doi: 10.4103/2277-9531.162387. eCollection 2015. J Educ Health Promot. 2015. PMID: 26430693 Free PMC article.
-
Retention of basic sciences knowledge at clinical years of medical curriculum.Croat Med J. 2006 Dec;47(6):882-7. Croat Med J. 2006. PMID: 17167861 Free PMC article.
-
Basic medical sciences and understanding medicine: Insights from medical students.PLoS One. 2025 Jun 9;20(6):e0325749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325749. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40489513 Free PMC article.
-
Summary of Progress in the Medical Sciences.Chic Med J Exam. 1875 Sep;32(9):676-695. Chic Med J Exam. 1875. PMID: 37616915 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
A systematic review of medical practitioners' retention and application of basic sciences to clinical practice.BMC Med Educ. 2024 Sep 13;24(1):997. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05952-8. BMC Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 39272053 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous