Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep 19;3(3):70-80.
doi: 10.17886/RKI-GBE-2018-088. eCollection 2018 Sep.

Ad hoc surveys at the Robert Koch Institute

Affiliations

Ad hoc surveys at the Robert Koch Institute

Patrick Schmich et al. J Health Monit. .

Abstract

The Robert Koch Institute (RKI) regularly conducts nationally representative cross-sectional studies (KiGGS, DEGS and GEDA) as part of the nationwide health monitoring system. In addition to these health surveys, data is collected in telephone interviews either on specific thematic fields (such as diabetes) or specific groups (such as medical staff) that were not or only insufficiently covered by the larger health surveys. As they are flexible and fast, ad hoc surveys conducted via telephone interviews can respond to specific epidemiological and health political questions. This article describes the procedures applied in ad hoc telephone interview surveys, which were newly introduced as a standardised method in 2017 and are applied by the Laboratory for Health Surveys at the RKI. The article presents the stages of project management such as concept development, establishment of a concept for data protection, questionnaire development, pre-test and field phase, calculation of weighting factors and provision of the final data set. The aim is to describe the process and shed light on the standardised procedures, the reported quality indicators and the breadth of possible scenarios of application.

Keywords: HEALTH MONITORING; METHODOLOGIES; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; QUALITY ASSURANCE; TELEPHONE INTERVIEW.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The course of the ad hoc surveys Source: Own diagram
Figure 2
Figure 2
Visualisation of a dual frame sample; all telephone numbers in the sampling frame, including those that cannot be reached Source: Own diagram
Figure 3
Figure 3
Ad hoc survey quality assurance process Source: Own diagram

References

    1. Hoffmann R, Lange M, Butschalowsky H, et al. (2018) KiGGS Wave 2 cross-sectional study – participant acquisition, response rates and representativeness. Journal of Health Monitoring 3(1):78-91 https://edoc.rki.de/handle/176904/5637 (As at 10.07.2018) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kamtsiuris P, Lange M, Schaffrath Rosario A. (2007) Der Kinder- und Jugendgesundheitssurvey (KiGGS): Stichprobendesign, Response und Nonresponse-Analyse. Bundesgesundheitsbl 50:547-556. https://edoc.rki.de/handle/176904/401 (As at 10.07.2018) - PubMed
    1. Lange M, Butschalowsky H, Jentsch F, et al. (2014) Die erste KiGGS-Folgebefragung (KiGGS Welle 1) Studiendurchführung, Stichprobendesign und Response. Bundesgesundheitsbl 57:747-761. https://edoc.rki.de/handle/176904/1888 (As at 10.07.2018) - PubMed
    1. Kamtsiuris P, Lange M, Hoffmann R, et al. (2013) The first wave of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS1). Sampling design, response, weighting, and representativeness Bundesgesundheitsbl 56:620-630. https://edoc.rki.de/handle/176904/1519 (As at 10.07.2018) - PubMed
    1. Paprott R, Heidemann C, Stühmann LM, et al. (2018) First results from the study ‘Disease knowledge and information needs - Diabetes mellitus (2017)’. Journal of Health Monitoring 3(S3):22-60. https://edoc.rki.de/handle/176904/5680 (As at 10.07.2018) - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources