Expanding the work of developing healthy masculinities: Reply to Griffith (2022), Liang (2022), and Rogers (2022)
- PMID: 35587402
- DOI: 10.1037/amp0001003
Expanding the work of developing healthy masculinities: Reply to Griffith (2022), Liang (2022), and Rogers (2022)
Abstract
Our response to the essays from Griffith (2022), Liang (2022), and Rogers (2022) addresses three themes we identified in the articles. First, feminist epistemology continues to play a critical role in the development of the study of men and masculinities. Second, structural change is essential to produce healthy masculinities, but we need to better understand the relationship between creating a critical mass of men and bringing about systemic, cultural, and institutional change. And, finally, even though all men must contend with hegemonic socialization, we must also recognize that men of different social identities stand in different relation to hegemonic masculinity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Comment on
-
A relational-cultural framework for promoting healthy masculinities.Am Psychol. 2022 Apr;77(3):321-332. doi: 10.1037/amp0000929. Am Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35587398
-
"Healthy masculinities are mosaics": Commentary on Di Bianca and Mahalik (2022).Am Psychol. 2022 Apr;77(3):333-335. doi: 10.1037/amp0000974. Am Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35587399 Free PMC article.
-
An intersectional perspective on relational-cultural theory: Commentary on Di Bianca and Mahalik (2022).Am Psychol. 2022 Apr;77(3):336-337. doi: 10.1037/amp0000971. Am Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35587400
-
From promoting healthy masculinities to nurturing healthy humans and societies: Commentary on Di Bianca and Mahalik (2022).Am Psychol. 2022 Apr;77(3):338-340. doi: 10.1037/amp0000976. Am Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35587401
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources