Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 29;10(3):e0164321.
doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01643-21. Epub 2022 May 19.

Large Comparative Analyses of Primate Body Site Microbiomes Indicate that the Oral Microbiome Is Unique among All Body Sites and Conserved among Nonhuman Primates

Affiliations

Large Comparative Analyses of Primate Body Site Microbiomes Indicate that the Oral Microbiome Is Unique among All Body Sites and Conserved among Nonhuman Primates

Abigail E Asangba et al. Microbiol Spectr. .

Abstract

The study of the mammalian microbiome serves as a critical tool for understanding host-microbial diversity and coevolution and the impact of bacterial communities on host health. While studies of specific microbial systems (e.g., in the human gut) have rapidly increased, large knowledge gaps remain, hindering our understanding of the determinants and levels of variation in microbiomes across multiple body sites and host species. Here, we compare microbiome community compositions from eight distinct body sites among 17 phylogenetically diverse species of nonhuman primates (NHPs), representing the largest comparative study of microbial diversity across primate host species and body sites. Analysis of 898 samples predominantly acquired in the wild demonstrated that oral microbiomes were unique in their clustering, with distinctive divergence from all other body site microbiomes. In contrast, all other body site microbiomes clustered principally by host species and differentiated by body site within host species. These results highlight two key findings: (i) the oral microbiome is unique compared to all other body site microbiomes and conserved among diverse nonhuman primates, despite their considerable dietary and phylogenetic differences, and (ii) assessments of the determinants of host-microbial diversity are relative to the level of the comparison (i.e., intra-/inter-body site, -host species, and -individual), emphasizing the need for broader comparative microbial analyses across diverse hosts to further elucidate host-microbial dynamics, evolutionary and biological patterns of variation, and implications for human-microbial coevolution. IMPORTANCE The microbiome is critical to host health and disease, but much remains unknown about the determinants, levels, and evolution of host-microbial diversity. The relationship between hosts and their associated microbes is complex. Most studies to date have focused on the gut microbiome; however, large gaps remain in our understanding of host-microbial diversity, coevolution, and levels of variation in microbiomes across multiple body sites and host species. To better understand the patterns of variation and evolutionary context of host-microbial communities, we conducted one of the largest comparative studies to date, which indicated that the oral microbiome was distinct from the microbiomes of all other body sites and convergent across host species, suggesting conserved niche specialization within the Primates order. We also show the importance of host species differences in shaping the microbiome within specific body sites. This large, comparative study contributes valuable information on key patterns of variation among hosts and body sites, with implications for understanding host-microbial dynamics and human-microbial coevolution.

Keywords: microbiome; nonhuman primates; variation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
(A) Relative abundances (%) of phylum-level microbial community compositions of different body sites for all host species combined. (B) Alpha (within-sample) diversity showing the species richness and evenness of all samples. Boxplots of observed ASVs (a qualitative measure of community richness) and Shannon’s diversity index (a quantitative measure of community richness). Results marked with the same letter are not statistically significantly different at an alpha value of 0.05, while results with different letters are statistically significantly different at an alpha value of 0.05. (C and D) Beta (between-sample) diversity, showing the distribution of samples. (C) PCoA plot of unweighted UniFrac distances (a qualitative measure of community dissimilarity that incorporates phylogenetic relationships between the microbial species). (D) PCoA plot of weighted UniFrac distances (a quantitative measure of community dissimilarity that incorporates phylogenetic relationships between the features).
FIG 2
FIG 2
(A and B) Beta (between-sample) diversity, showing the distribution of samples, for samples from all species contributing oral samples and samples from at least one other body site. (A) PCoA plot of unweighted UniFrac distance (a qualitative measure of community dissimilarity that incorporates phylogenetic relationships between the microbial species). (B) Boxplot of quantified interindividual distances within all body sites. Results marked with the same letter are not significantly different at an alpha value of 0.05, while results with different letters are significantly different at an alpha value of 0.05. (C and D) Oral, rectal, and penile/vaginal samples from chimpanzee, Verreaux’s sifaka, mangabey, and titi monkey. (C) Beta (between-sample) diversity, showing the distribution of samples. PCoA plot of unweighted UniFrac distances (a qualitative measure of community dissimilarity that incorporates phylogenetic relationships between the microbial species). (D) Boxplot of the quantified beta diversity distances within and between groups. (E) Rectal, penile, and vaginal samples from chimpanzee, Verreaux’s sifaka, mangabey, and titi monkey. Beta (between-sample) diversity, showing the distribution of samples. PCoA plot of unweighted UniFrac distances (a qualitative measure of community dissimilarity that incorporates phylogenetic relationships between the microbial species).
FIG 3
FIG 3
Oral, rectal, penile, and vaginal samples from chimpanzees, Verreaux’s sifakas, mangabeys, and titi monkeys. (A) Phylum-level microbial community compositions of samples. (B) Alpha (within-sample) diversity, showing the species richness and evenness of samples. Boxplots of observed ASVs (a qualitative measure of community richness) and Shannon’s diversity index (a quantitative measure of community richness). Results marked with the same letter are not significantly different at an alpha value of 0.05, while results with different letters are significantly different at an alpha value of 0.05. (C to F) Beta (between-sample) diversity, showing the distribution of samples. PCoA plots of unweighted UniFrac distances (a qualitative measure of community dissimilarity that incorporates phylogenetic relationships between the microbial species) for chimpanzee (C), titi monkey (D), Verreaux’s sifaka (E), and mangabey (F).

References

    1. Yildirim S, Yeoman CJ, Sipos M, Torralba M, Wilson BA, Goldberg TL, Stumpf RM, Leigh SR, White BA, Nelson KE. 2010. Characterization of the fecal microbiome from non-human wild primates reveals species specific microbial communities. PLoS One 5:e13963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013963. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ochman H, Worobey M, Kuo C-H, Ndjango J-BN, Peeters M, Hahn BH, Hugenholtz P. 2010. Evolutionary relationships of wild hominids recapitulated by gut microbial communities. PLoS Biol 8:e1000546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000546. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McCord AI, Chapman CA, Weny G, Tumukunde A, Hyeroba D, Klotz K, Koblings AS, Mbora DNM, Cregger M, White BA, Leigh SR, Goldberg TL. 2014. Fecal microbiomes of non‐human primates in Western Uganda reveal species‐specific communities largely resistant to habitat perturbation. Am J Primatol 76:347–354. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22238. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fogel AT. 2015. The gut microbiome of wild lemurs: a comparison of sympatric Lemur catta and Propithecus verreauxi. Folia Primatol (Basel) 86:85–95. doi: 10.1159/000369971. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amato KR, Sanders JG, Song SJ, Nute M, Metcalf JL, Thompson LR, Morton JT, Amir A, McKenzie VJ, Humphrey G, Gogul G, Gaffney J, Baden AL, Britton GAO, Cuozzo FP, Fiore AD, Dominy NJ, Goldberg TL, Gomez A, Kowalewski MM, Lewis RJ, Link A, Sauther ML, Tecot S, White BA, Nelson KE, Stumpf RM, Knight R, Leigh SR. 2019. Evolutionary trends in host physiology outweigh dietary niche in structuring primate gut microbiomes. ISME J 13:576–587. doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0175-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types