Diffuse glioma, not otherwise specified: imaging-based risk stratification achieves histomolecular-level prognostication
- PMID: 35587830
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08850-z
Diffuse glioma, not otherwise specified: imaging-based risk stratification achieves histomolecular-level prognostication
Abstract
Objectives: To determine whether imaging-based risk stratification enables prognostication in diffuse glioma, NOS (not otherwise specified).
Methods: Data from 220 patients classified as diffuse glioma, NOS, between January 2011 and December 2020 were retrospectively included. Two neuroradiologists analyzed pre-surgical CT and MRI to assign gliomas to the three imaging-based risk types considering well-known imaging phenotypes (e.g., T2/FLAIR mismatch). According to the 2021 World Health Organization classification, the three risk types included (1) low-risk, expecting oligodendroglioma, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant, and 1p/19q-codeleted; (2) intermediate-risk, expecting astrocytoma, IDH-mutant; and (3) high-risk, expecting glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated for each risk type. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analysis using 10-fold cross-validation with 100-fold bootstrapping was used to compare the performance of an imaging-based survival model with that of a historical molecular-based survival model published in 2015, created using The Cancer Genome Archive data.
Results: Prognostication according to the three imaging-based risk types was achieved for both PFS and OS (log-rank test, p < 0.001). The imaging-based survival model showed high prognostic value, with areas under the curves (AUCs) of 0.772 and 0.650 for 1-year PFS and OS, respectively, similar to the historical molecular-based survival model (AUC = 0.74 for PFS and 0.87 for OS). The imaging-based survival model achieved high long-term performance in both 3-year PFS (AUC = 0.806) and 5-year OS (AUC = 0.812).
Conclusion: Imaging-based risk stratification achieved histomolecular-level prognostication in diffuse glioma, NOS, and could aid in guiding patient referral for insufficient or unsuccessful molecular diagnosis.
Key points: • Three imaging-based risk types enable distinct prognostication in diffuse glioma, NOS (not otherwise specified). • The imaging-based survival model achieved similar prognostic performance as a historical molecular-based survival model. • For long-term prognostication of 3 and 5 years, the imaging-based survival model showed high performance.
Keywords: Diagnostic molecular pathology; Glioma; Imaging genomics; Prognosis.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.
Comment in
-
Editorial comment: "Diffuse glioma, not otherwise specified: imaging-based risk stratification achieves histomolecular-level prognostication".Eur Radiol. 2022 Nov;32(11):7778-7779. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09098-3. Epub 2022 Sep 13. Eur Radiol. 2022. PMID: 36100776 No abstract available.
References
-
- Hu N, Richards R, Jensen R (2016) Role of chromosomal 1p/19q co-deletion on the prognosis of oligodendrogliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery 5:58–63 - DOI
-
- Jenkins RB, Blair H, Ballman KV et al (2006) A t(1;19)(q10;p10) mediates the combined deletions of 1p and 19q and predicts a better prognosis of patients with oligodendroglioma. Cancer Res 66:9852–9861 - DOI
-
- Brat DJ, Verhaak RG, Aldape KD et al (2015) Comprehensive, integrative genomic analysis of diffuse lower-grade gliomas. N Engl J Med 372:2481–2498 - DOI
-
- Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G et al (2016) The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 131:803–820 - DOI
-
- Louis DN, Wesseling P, Paulus W et al (2018) cIMPACT-NOW update 1: Not Otherwise Specified (NOS) and Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC). Acta Neuropathol 135:481–484 - DOI
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
