Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 May-Jun;57(3):186-194.
doi: 10.1016/j.regg.2022.03.005. Epub 2022 May 16.

[Review of the validity of fall risk assessment scales in hospitalised patients]

[Article in Spanish]
Affiliations
Review

[Review of the validity of fall risk assessment scales in hospitalised patients]

[Article in Spanish]
Marta Gutiérrez-Valencia et al. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2022 May-Jun.

Abstract

Falls in the hospital setting are a major health problem due to their high prevalence and their physical, functional, psychological or economic consequences. Since 1990s, different fall risk assessment scales have been developed to detect high-risk patients, which are also applied in the hospital setting. The aim of this review is to analyse the validity of different scales for assessing fall risk in adults in the hospital setting, especially in elderly patients. Following a literature search in April 2021, 36 primary studies were found that analysed the validity of the Downton, Morse, HendrichII, Stratify and Tinetti scales. Meta-analyses of sensitivity and specificity showed a high heterogeneity that does not allow recommending a specific tool that can be considered as standard in acute inpatients.

Keywords: Caídas; Escalas; Falls; Meta-analysis; Metaanálisis; Review; Revisión; Risk assessment; Scales; Valoración del riesgo.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources