Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Jul;33(7):1435-1449.
doi: 10.1111/jce.15549. Epub 2022 May 30.

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in the elderly >75 years old: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in the elderly >75 years old: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Narut Prasitlumkum et al. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is increasingly performed worldwide. As comfort with AF ablation increases, the procedure is increasingly used in patients that are older and in those with more comorbidities. However, it is not well established whether AF ablation in the elderly, especially those >75 years old, has comparable safety and efficacy to younger populations.

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety profiles in patients older than 75 years undergoing AF ablation with younger patients.

Methods: Databases from EMBASE, Medline, PubMed, and Cochrane, were searched from inception through September 2021. Studies that compared the success rates in AF catheter ablation and all complications rates between patients who were older vs under 75 years were included. Effect estimates from the individual studies were extracted and combined using random effect, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird.

Results: Twenty-seven observational studies were included in the analysis consisting of 363,542 patients who underwent AF ablation. Comparing patients older than 75 years old to younger patients, there was no difference in the success of ablation rates between elderly and younger patients (pooled OR 0.85: 95% CI:0.69-1.05, p = .131). On the other hand, AF ablation in the elderly was associated with higher complication rates (pooled OR 1.42: 95% CI:1.21-1.68, p < .001).

Conclusion: As AF ablation is expanded to elderly populations, our study found that AF ablation success rates were similar in both elderly and younger patients. However, older patients experience higher rates of complications that should be considered when offering the procedure and as a means to improve outcomes with future innovations.

Keywords: ablation; atrial fibrillation; complication; efficacy; elderly; older than 75 years.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Andrade J, Khairy P, Dobrev D, Nattel S. The clinical profile and pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation: relationships among clinical features, epidemiology, and mechanisms. Circ Res. 2014;114(9):1453-1468.
    1. Feinberg WM, Blackshear JL, Laupacis A, Kronmal R, Hart RG. Prevalence, age distribution, and gender of patients with atrial fibrillation. Analysis and implications. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(5):469-473.
    1. Newgard CB, Sharpless NE. Coming of age: molecular drivers of aging and therapeutic opportunities. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(3):946-950.
    1. Packer DL, Mark DB, Robb RA, et al. Effect of catheter ablation vs antiarrhythmic drug therapy on mortality, stroke, bleeding, and cardiac arrest among patients with atrial fibrillation: the CABANA randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;321(13):1261-1274.
    1. Kewcharoen J, Prasitlumkum N, Chokesuwattanaskul R, et al. Ablation versus medication as initial therapy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Arrhythm. 2021;37(6):1448-1458.