Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 19;12(1):8467.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12095-7.

Endometrial microbiome: sampling, assessment, and possible impact on embryo implantation

Affiliations

Endometrial microbiome: sampling, assessment, and possible impact on embryo implantation

Marco Reschini et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

There is growing interest on the potential clinical relevance of the endometrial microbiome. However, insufficient attention has been given to the methodology of sampling. To minimize contamination, we advocate the use of the double-lumen catheters commonly employed for the embryo transfer. Endometrial fluid samples obtained from 53 women scheduled for IVF were studied for microbiome characterization. Control samples from the vagina of these same women were concomitantly obtained. Samples were analysed by V3-V4-V6 regions of 16S rRNA gene sequencing with Next Generation Sequencing technique. Endometrial Lactobacillus-dominant cases were uncommon compared to previous evidence, being observed in only 4 (8%) women. Taxonomy markedly differed between the endometrial and vaginal microbiomes composition. The most common bacterial genera coincided in only 4 (8%) women. The comparison between women who did and did not subsequently become pregnant failed to identify any microorganism associated with the success of the procedure. However, the endometrial biodiversity resulted higher among pregnant women. Shannon's Equitability index in pregnant and non pregnant women was 0.76 [0.57-0.87] and 0.55 [0.51-0.64], respectively (p = 0.002). In conclusion, the use of embryo transfer catheters for testing the endometrial microbiome is promising. The scant concordance with vaginal samples supports the validity of this approach. Moreover, our study highlighted a possible beneficial role of a higher biodiversity on endometrial receptivity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Somigliana reports grants from Ferring, grants and personal fees from Merck-Serono, grants and personal fees from Theramex and Gedeon-Richter, outside the submitted work. All the other authors do not have any competing interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The double-lumen catheter used for endometrial sample collection. This type of catheter is commonly used for embryo transfer. The outer hollow catheter (represented in grey) is placed with its distal part just above the internal os of the cervix. Thereafter, the inner catheter (with a smaller diameter, represented in white) can easily pass through the first one, avoiding contacts with the vaginal and cervical mucosae. Once reached the endometrial cavity, endometrial collection of the endometrial fluid can be obtained by gentle traction on the syringe. The box of upper left corner of the figure shows in more details the mechanism of the double-lumen system.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Shannon and Shannon’s equitability indexes in women who did and did not become pregnant. A statistically significant difference emerged for both indexes in the endometrial microbiomes (p = 0.036 and p = 0.002, respectively). Conversely, no significant differences could be observed for the vaginal microbiomes.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Benner M, Ferwerda G, Joosten I, van der Molen RG. How uterine microbiota might be responsible for a receptive, fertile endometrium. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2018;24(4):393–415. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmy012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agostinis C, Mangogna A, Bossi F, Ricci G, Kishore U, Bulla R. Uterine immunity and microbiota: A shifting paradigm. Front. Immunol. 2019;17(10):2387. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02387. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hashimoto T, Kyono K. Does dysbiotic endometrium affect blastocyst implantation in IVF patients? J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2019;36(12):2471–2479. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01630-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. O'Callaghan JL, Turner R, Dekker Nitert M, Barrett HL, Clifton V, Pelzer ES. Re-assessing microbiomes in the low-biomass reproductive niche. BJOG. 2020;127(2):147–158. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15974. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Altmäe S, Rienzi L. Endometrial microbiome: New hope, or hype? Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2021;42(6):1051–1052. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.05.001. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances