Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 19;12(1):8377.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12316-z.

Machine learning to predict end stage kidney disease in chronic kidney disease

Affiliations

Machine learning to predict end stage kidney disease in chronic kidney disease

Qiong Bai et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of machine learning (ML) in predicting the risk of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) from patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Data were obtained from a longitudinal CKD cohort. Predictor variables included patients' baseline characteristics and routine blood test results. The outcome of interest was the presence or absence of ESKD by the end of 5 years. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputation. Five ML algorithms, including logistic regression, naïve Bayes, random forest, decision tree, and K-nearest neighbors were trained and tested using fivefold cross-validation. The performance of each model was compared to that of the Kidney Failure Risk Equation (KFRE). The dataset contained 748 CKD patients recruited between April 2006 and March 2008, with the follow-up time of 6.3 ± 2.3 years. ESKD was observed in 70 patients (9.4%). Three ML models, including the logistic regression, naïve Bayes and random forest, showed equivalent predictability and greater sensitivity compared to the KFRE. The KFRE had the highest accuracy, specificity, and precision. This study showed the feasibility of ML in evaluating the prognosis of CKD based on easily accessible features. Three ML models with adequate performance and sensitivity scores suggest a potential use for patient screenings. Future studies include external validation and improving the models with additional predictor variables.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ROC curves of the random forest algorithm and the KFRE model.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zhang L, et al. Trends in chronic kidney disease in China. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;375:905–906. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1602469. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bello AK, et al. Effective CKD care in European countries: Challenges and opportunities for health policy. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2015;65:15–25. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.07.033. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Subbiah AK, Chhabra YK, Mahajan S. Cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic kidney disease: A neglected subgroup. Heart Asia. 2016;8:56–61. doi: 10.1136/heartasia-2016-010809. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pecoits-Filho R, et al. Interactions between kidney disease and diabetes: Dangerous liaisons. Diabetol. Metab. Syndr. 2016;8:50. doi: 10.1186/s13098-016-0159-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weiner DE, et al. Chronic kidney disease as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: A pooled analysis of community-based studies. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2004;15:1307–1315. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000123691.46138.e2. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types