Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 11:13:485-494.
doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S344301. eCollection 2022.

Teaching Undergraduate Medical Students Non-Technical Skills: An Evaluation Study of a Simulated Ward Experience

Jennifer Pollard  1 , Michal Tombs  2
Affiliations

Teaching Undergraduate Medical Students Non-Technical Skills: An Evaluation Study of a Simulated Ward Experience

Jennifer Pollard et al. Adv Med Educ Pract. .

Abstract

Purpose: Research suggests that medical students in the UK report a need to be better prepared for the non-technical skills required for the role of a junior doctor. A Simulated Ward Experience was developed in an attempt to address this need. The purpose of this study was (1) to evaluate the effectiveness of the Simulated Ward Experiences by examining students' reactions regarding the quality of teaching and (2) to examine the main drivers of learning and the extent to which students felt it helped them prepare for their future training.

Methods: A mixed method evaluation study was conducted using a questionnaire and focus groups. Final year students who participated in the Simulated Ward Experience were invited to contribute to the evaluation, out of which 25 completed the questionnaire and 13 took part in focus group interviews. Data analysis were conducted by means of descriptive statistics for questionnaire data and thematic analysis of focus group transcripts.

Results: The median Likert scores for quality of teaching Non-Technical Skills were either very good or excellent, demonstrating that students were highly satisfied with the way in which these were taught. Qualitative data provided further insights into the aspects of the intervention that promoted learning, and these were categorised into four themes, including realism of the simulation; relevance for the role and responsibilities of the Foundation Year 1 Doctor (including Non-Technical Skills); learning from and with others; and supportive learning environment.

Conclusion: This evaluation study provides further evidence of the value of learning in a simulated setting, particularly when it is closely aligned to the real clinical context and creates opportunities to practice skills that are perceived to be relevant by the learner. Study limitations are recognised and suggestions for further studies are provided.

Keywords: evaluation; non-technical skills; preparedness; simulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overall quality of teaching ratings for each NTS.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sexton JB, Thomas EJ, Helmreich RL. Error, stress, and teamwork in medicine and aviation: cross sectional surveys. BMJ. 2000;320(7237):745–749. doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7237.745 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Helmreich RL. On error management: lessons from aviation. BMJ. 2000;320(7237):781–785. doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7237.781 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gordon M. Non-technical skills training to enhance patient safety. Clin Teach. 2013;10(3):170–175. doi:10.1111/j.1743-498X.2012.00640.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Flin R, O’Connor P, Crichton M. Safety at the Sharp End: A Guide to Non-Technical Skills. Taylor & Francis; 2008.
    1. General Medical Council. Generic professional capabilities framework; 2017:8–9.