The End of Roe v. Wade
- PMID: 35593911
- DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2075962
The End of Roe v. Wade
Abstract
The Supreme Court seems poised to overrule Roe v. Wade and hold that there is no constitutional right to choose abortion. The reversal of Roe seems to run counter to public opinion in the United States-while many favor restrictions, a clear majority do not want Roe reversed and favor access to abortion early in pregnancy. The current Court's apparent willingness to run the risk of political pushback has a complex history. Scholars have long described the Court as a countermajoritarian institution, but in practice, as historians have shown, the Court tends not to stray too far from popular opinion. For a Court bent on reversing Roe and tackling a long list of other divisive topic, concerns about institutional legitimacy no longer appear to be an effective check. A post-Roe Court may be more unplugged from popular opinion, with unpredictable results for the future of the democracy.
Keywords: Abortion; LAW.
Comment in
-
Rethinking Fetal Personhood in Conceptualizing Roe.Am J Bioeth. 2022 Aug;22(8):64-68. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2089485. Am J Bioeth. 2022. PMID: 35917414 No abstract available.
-
Travel to Other States for Abortion after Dobbs.Am J Bioeth. 2022 Aug;22(8):42-44. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2089486. Am J Bioeth. 2022. PMID: 35917416 No abstract available.
-
Ending the Debate Whether State-Mandated Pregnancies are Matters of Bioethics Concern.Am J Bioeth. 2022 Aug;22(8):31-33. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2089487. Am J Bioeth. 2022. PMID: 35917418 No abstract available.
-
Private Conversations, Public Debate.Am J Bioeth. 2022 Aug;22(8):47-49. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2089285. Am J Bioeth. 2022. PMID: 35917426 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical