Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2213234.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.13234.

Assessment of Bias in Patient Safety Reporting Systems Categorized by Physician Gender, Race and Ethnicity, and Faculty Rank: A Qualitative Study

Affiliations

Assessment of Bias in Patient Safety Reporting Systems Categorized by Physician Gender, Race and Ethnicity, and Faculty Rank: A Qualitative Study

Élan Burton et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Patient safety reporting systems (PSRSs) are designed to decrease the risk of harm to patients due to medical errors. Owing to the voluntary nature of PSRSs, implicit bias of the reporter may affect the management of safety events reported. Stanford Alert For Events (SAFE) is the PSRS used at Stanford Health Care.

Objective: To examine whether variation exists in the content of SAFE reports based on demographic characteristics of physicians who are the subject of the event report.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective qualitative analysis from a single academic medical center evaluated SAFE reports from March 2011 to February 2020. Event reports were coded by theme and categorized by severity (scale of 1 to 3, with 1 being the lowest and 3 the highest). The reports were then analyzed from October 2020 to February 2022 and categorized by physician gender, race and ethnicity, and faculty rank. A total of 501 patient safety events were collected from the adult hospital during the study period, and 100 were excluded owing to incompleteness of information.

Main outcomes and measures: This qualitative study had no planned outcome.

Results: A qualitative analysis was performed on 401 reports representing 187 physicians (138 [73.8%] male and 49 [26.2%] female). In terms of race and ethnicity, 4 physicians (2.1%) were African American, 49 (26.2%) were Asian; 7 (3.7%), Hispanic or Latinx; 108 (57.7%), White; and 19 (10.2%), declined to state. Female physicians had disproportionate representation among reports referencing communication and conversational issues and the lowest severity level. Male physicians had disproportionate representation for ignoring or omitting procedures, process issues, and physical intimidation. African American physicians had disproportionate representation for lack of communication and process issues. Asian physicians had disproportionate representation for lack of communication, process issues, conversational conduct, and the lowest severity level. Latinx physicians had disproportionate representation for conversational conduct. White physicians had disproportionate representation for ignoring or omitting procedures, verbal abuse, physical intimidation, and the highest severity level.

Conclusions and relevance: In this qualitative study, female physicians and physicians who were members of racial and ethnic minority groups were more likely to be reported for low-severity communication issues compared with their male and White counterparts, respectively. These findings suggest that there may be a lower threshold for reporting events when the subject of the report is female and/or a member of a racial or ethnic minority group. Restructuring the reporting and management of patient safety events may be needed to facilitate conflict resolution in a manner that reduces implicit bias and fosters team cohesion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Leape LL. Patient safety in the era of healthcare reform. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(5):1568-1573. doi:10.1007/s11999-014-3598-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pronovost P, Morclock L, Sexton B, et al. . Improving the value of patient safety reporting systems. August 2018. Accessed December 31, 2020. https://www.ahrq.gov/downloads/pub/advances2/vol1/Advances-Pronovost_95.pdf
    1. Ramírez E, Martín A, Villán Y, et al. ; SINOIRES Working Group . Effectiveness and limitations of an incident-reporting system analyzed by local clinical safety leaders in a tertiary hospital: prospective evaluation through real-time observations of patient safety incidents. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(38):e12509. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000012509 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sinclair A, Guérin A, Robin C, Dey P. Investigating the cost and efficiency of incident reporting in a specialist paediatric NHS hospital and impact on patient safety. Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2017;24(2):91-95. doi:10.1136/ejhpharm-2016-000926 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guest G, MacQueen K, Namey E. Themes and codes. In: Guest G, MacQueen K, Namey E, eds. Applied Thematic Analysis. SAGE Publications; 2012:49-78.