Evolution of Investigating Informed Assent Discussions about CPR in Seriously Ill Patients
- PMID: 35595375
- PMCID: PMC9179950
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.03.009
Evolution of Investigating Informed Assent Discussions about CPR in Seriously Ill Patients
Abstract
Context: Outcomes after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) remain poor. We have spent 10 years investigating an "informed assent" (IA) approach to discussing CPR with chronically ill patients/families. IA is a discussion framework whereby patients extremely unlikely to benefit from CPR are informed that unless they disagree, CPR will not be performed because it will not help achieve their goals, thus removing the burden of decision-making from the patient/family, while they retain an opportunity to disagree.
Objectives: Determine the acceptability and efficacy of IA discussions about CPR with older chronically ill patients/families.
Methods: This multi-site research occurred in three stages. Stage I determined acceptability of the intervention through focus groups of patients with advanced COPD or malignancy, family members, and physicians. Stage II was an ambulatory pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the IA discussion. Stage III is an ongoing phase 2 RCT of IA versus attention control in in patients with advanced chronic illness.
Results: Our qualitative work found the IA approach was acceptable to most patients, families, and physicians. The pilot RCT demonstrated feasibility and showed an increase in participants in the intervention group changing from "full code" to "do not resuscitate" within two weeks after the intervention. However, Stages I and II found that IA is best suited to inpatients. Our phase 2 RCT in older hospitalized seriously ill patients is ongoing; results are pending.
Conclusions: IA is a feasible and reasonable approach to CPR discussions in selected patient populations.
Keywords: Code status; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; communication; end-of-life; seriously ill patients.
Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A Randomized Controlled Trial of a CPR and Intubation Video Decision Support Tool for Hospitalized Patients.J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Aug;30(8):1071-80. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3200-2. Epub 2015 Feb 18. J Gen Intern Med. 2015. PMID: 25691237 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Understanding cardiopulmonary resuscitation decision making: perspectives of seriously ill hospitalized patients and family members.Chest. 2006 Aug;130(2):419-28. doi: 10.1378/chest.130.2.419. Chest. 2006. PMID: 16899840
-
Factors associated with use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in seriously ill hospitalized adults.JAMA. 1999 Dec 22-29;282(24):2333-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.24.2333. JAMA. 1999. PMID: 10612321
-
Informed consent and the aftermath of cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Ethical considerations.Nurs Ethics. 2019 Feb;26(1):84-95. doi: 10.1177/0969733017700234. Epub 2017 Apr 26. Nurs Ethics. 2019. PMID: 28443357 Review.
-
The culture of dysthanasia: attempting CPR in terminally ill children.Pediatrics. 2013 Mar;131(3):572-80. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0393. Epub 2013 Feb 4. Pediatrics. 2013. PMID: 23382437 Review.
References
-
- https://www.heart.org/en/professional/quality-improvement/get-with-the-g..., accessed Dec. 27, 2021.
-
- Schluep M, Gravesteijn BY, Stolker RJ, Endeman H, Hoeks SE. One-year survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation 2018;132:90–100. - PubMed
-
- Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Asch DA. Harnessing the power of default options to improve health care. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1340–4. - PubMed