Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;305(10):2766-2790.
doi: 10.1002/ar.24993. Epub 2022 May 20.

Palate evolution in early-branching crocodylomorphs: Implications for homology, systematics, and ecomorphology

Kathleen N Dollman  1   2 , Jonah N Choiniere  2
Affiliations

Palate evolution in early-branching crocodylomorphs: Implications for homology, systematics, and ecomorphology

Kathleen N Dollman et al. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Living crocodylomorphs have an ossified secondary palate with a posteriorly positioned choana that enables their semi-aquatic, predatory ecology. In contrast, the earliest branching members of Crocodylomorpha have an open palate with anteriorly positioned choanae. The evolution of an ossified secondary palate and a posteriorly positioned choana features strongly in hypotheses of broad-scale phylogenetic relationships within Crocodylomorpha. Renewed investigations into palatal morphology among extinct members of the clade show surprising variability in the anatomy of the palate, with at least one and potentially a second independent occurrence of "eusuchian-type" palate outside of Eusuchia. Understanding the trajectory of crocodylomorph palatal evolution is, therefore, a key to inferring crocodylomorph interrelationships and ecomorphology. To document early-branching crocodylomorph palatal anatomy, we developed an anatomical comparative dataset using computed tomography scan data and literature, comprising 12 early-branching crocodylomorph taxa. To understand discrete phenotypic changes in palatal structure, we compiled a phylogenetically broadly sampled character-taxon matrix from the existing literature, and revised its palatal characters, adding 10 new palatal characters. Our comparative anatomical investigations allow us to propose an adapted hypothesis for the closure of the palate and the posterior migration of the choana. Our phylogenetic findings corroborate previous research showing that non-crocodyliform crocodylomorphs ("sphenosuchians") are paraphyletic, with the exclusion of the clade Hallopodidae. Non-mesoeucrocodylian crocodyliforms ("protosuchians") are paraphyletic, but form three monophyletic clades: Notochampsoidea, Shartegosuchoidea, and Gobiosuchidae. We find a potential association between secondary palate development and dietary shifts, particularly with regard to hypothesized origins of herbivory.

Keywords: crocodylian; phylogenetics; secondary palate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Palatal view of the three‐dimensional (3D) visualizations of the palates of “sphenosuchians” (a) Dibothrosuchus, (b) Litargosuchus, (c) Sphenosuchus. Ch r, choanal ridge; ect, ectopterygoid; j, jugal; max, maxilla; pal, palatine; pal d, palatine depression; pm, premaxilla; pt, pterygoid; v, vomer
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Interpreted anatomical reconstruction of the palatal view of the secondary palates of ‘sphenosuchians’ (a) Dibothrosuchus, (b) Litargosuchus, (c) Sphenosuchus, and (d) Terrestrisuchus. Missing or incomplete bones are in a lighter shade with a dashed line. Scale bar is 1 cm. Ch, choana; ch r, choanal ridge; i for, incisive foramen; pal d, palatine depression; sub fen, suborbital fenestra
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Palatal view of the three‐dimensional (3D) visualizations of the secondary palates of “protosuchians” (a) Protosuchus, (b) Orthosuchus, (c) Nominosuchus, and (d) Shartegosuchus. Ch g, choanal groove; ch r, choanal ridge; ect, ectopterygoid, j, jugal, max, maxilla, pal, palatine, pm, premaxilla, pt, pterygoid, v, vomer
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Interpreted anatomical reconstruction of the palatal view of the secondary palate “protosuchians” (a) Orthosuchus, (b) Protosuchus, (c) UCMP 97638, (d) Gobiosuchus, (e) Sichuanosuchus, (f) Nominosuchus, (g) Shantungosuchus, (h) Fruitachampsa, and (i) Shartegosuchus. Missing or incomplete bones are in a lighter shade with a dashed line. Scale bar is 1 cm. Ant pal fen, anterior palatal fenestra; ch, choana; i for, incisive foramen; naso phy, ventrally open nasopharyngeal duct; sub fen, suborbital fenestra
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Time calibrated strict consensus of the six MPTs (length = 1,263, CI = 0.446, and RI = 0.654)
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Major palatal configurations in palate evolution of crocodylomorphs represented by 19 skulls in palatal view. Palatal configurations were reconstructed based on CT scan data, or published data of known crocodylomorphs. Asterisks indicate crocodylomorph taxa not sampled in this analysis. Areas of the palate not preserved or not observable are illustrated with outlines used dashed lines and transparent coloring. Notable changes in anatomical palatal structures are bullet‐pointed, and the evolutionary stages are separated by black dashed lines. Palatal bones are colored, ectopterygoid, purple; jugal, green; maxilla, red; palatine, pink; premaxilla, light blue; pterygoid, brown
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Andrade, M. , Bertini, R. , & Pinheiro, A. (2006). Observations on the palate and choanae structures in mesoeucrocodylia (Archosauria, Crocodylomorpha): Phylogenetic implications. Revista Brasileria de Paleontologia, 9, 323–332.
    1. Barrios, F. , Bona, P. , Paulina‐Carabajal, A. , & Gasparini, Z. (2018). Re‐description of the cranio‐mandibular anatomy of Notosuchus terrestris (Crocodyliformes, mesoeucrocodylia) from the upper cretaceous of Patagonia. Cretaceous Research, 83, 3–39.
    1. Busbey, A. B. (1995). The structural consequences of skull flattening in crocodilians. In Thomason J. J. (Ed.), Functional morphology in vertebrate paleontology (pp. 173–192). Cambridge Press.
    1. Butler, R. , Barrett, P. , Kenrick, P. , & Penn, M. (2009). Diversity patterns amongst herbivorous dinosaurs and plants during the cretaceous: Implications for hypotheses of dinosaur/angiosperm co‐evolution. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 22, 446–459. - PubMed
    1. Clark, J. M. (1994). Patterns of evolution in Mesozoic Crocodyliformes. In Fraser N. C. & Sues H. (Eds.), In the shadow of dinosaurs (pp. 84–97). Cambridge University Press.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources