Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct;37(5):865-876.
doi: 10.1007/s10557-022-07345-9. Epub 2022 May 21.

Platelet-Mediated Transfer of Cardioprotection by Remote Ischemic Conditioning and Its Abrogation by Aspirin But Not by Ticagrelor

Affiliations

Platelet-Mediated Transfer of Cardioprotection by Remote Ischemic Conditioning and Its Abrogation by Aspirin But Not by Ticagrelor

Helmut Raphael Lieder et al. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2023 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: The role of platelets during myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) is ambivalent. They contribute to injury but also to cardioprotection. Repeated blood flow restriction and reperfusion in a tissue/organ remote from the heart (remote ischemic conditioning, RIC) reduce myocardial I/R injury and attenuate platelet activation. Whether or not platelets mediate RIC's cardioprotective signal is currently unclear.

Methods and results: Venous blood from healthy volunteers (without or with pretreatment of 500/1000 mg aspirin or 180 mg ticagrelor orally, 2-3 h before the study, n = 18 each) was collected before and after RIC (3 × 5 min blood pressure cuff inflation at 200 mmHg on the left upper arm/5 min deflation). Washed platelets were isolated. Platelet-poor plasma was used to prepare plasma-dialysates. Platelets (25 × 103/µL) or plasma-dialysates (1:10) prepared before and after RIC from untreated versus aspirin- or ticagrelor-pretreated volunteers, respectively, were infused into isolated buffer-perfused rat hearts. Hearts were subjected to global 30 min/120 min I/R. Infarct size was stained. Infarct size was less with infusion of platelets/plasma-dialysate after RIC (18 ± 7%/23 ± 9% of ventricular mass) than with platelets/plasma-dialysate before RIC (34 ± 7%/33 ± 8%). Aspirin pretreatment abrogated the transfer of RIC's cardioprotection by platelets (after/before RIC, 34 ± 7%/33 ± 7%) but only attenuated that by plasma-dialysate (after/before RIC, 26 ± 8%/32 ± 5%). Ticagrelor pretreatment induced an in vivo formation of cardioprotective factor(s) per se (platelets/plasma-dialysate before RIC, 26 ± 7%/26 ± 7%) but did not impact on RIC's cardioprotection by platelets/plasma-dialysate (20 ± 7%/21 ± 5%).

Conclusion: Platelets serve as carriers for RIC's cardioprotective signal through an aspirin-sensitive and thus cyclooxygenase-dependent mechanism. The P2Y12 inhibitor ticagrelor per se induces a humoral cardioprotective signal.

Keywords: Aspirin; Cardioprotection; Ischemia/reperfusion; Remote ischemic conditioning; Ticagrelor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Infusion of saline, aspirin, ticagrelor, or Tyrode buffer supplemented with apyrase and prostaglandin E1 does not impact on infarct size. Solutions were infused into isolated perfused rat hearts subjected to 30-min global ischemia and 120-min reperfusion. The concentrations for infusion with aspirin (40 µmol/L, n = 8) and ticagrelor (10 µmol/L, n = 8) were chosen to reflect the expected maximum plasma concentration 2–3 h after oral ingestion of aspirin and ticagrelor, respectively, in healthy volunteers. The concentration of apyrase and prostaglandin E1 (0.1 U/mL and 1 µmol/L, n = 8) was equal to that used for the preparation of washed platelet solutions. Infusion of saline (n = 10) served as control
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Turbidometric light transmission aggregometry of platelets sampled from volunteers before and after remote ischemic conditioning (RIC). Platelets were sampled before and after RIC from the same volunteers (n = 18): without pretreatment (n = 18), with aspirin pretreatment (n = 18), and with ticagrelor pretreatment (n = 18), respectively. White color indicates data before RIC, gray after RIC. PPP, platelet-poor plasma; PRP, platelet-rich plasma. a ADP-induced aggregation of platelet-rich plasma. *p < 0.001 vs. without pretreatment; #p < 0.001 vs. with aspirin pretreatment; Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA on Ranks and Dunn’s multiple comparison procedures. b Arachidonic acid-induced aggregation of platelet-rich plasma. *p < 0.001 vs. without pretreatment; #p < 0.001 vs. with aspirin pretreatment; Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA on Ranks and Dunn’s multiple comparison procedures. c Thrombin-induced aggregation of washed platelets
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Platelets serve as transmitters of remote ischemic conditioning’s (RIC)s cardioprotective signal through an aspirin-sensitive mechanism. Platelets were sampled before and after RIC from the same volunteers (n = 18): without pretreatment (n = 18), with aspirin pretreatment (n = 18), and with ticagrelor pretreatment (n = 18), respectively. Platelets were infused into isolated perfused rat hearts, which were then subjected to 30-min global ischemia/120-min reperfusion. In the aspirin pretreatment group, gray symbols indicate volunteers who were pretreated with 500 mg aspirin (n = 12) and black symbols those with 1000 mg aspirin (n = 6). *p < 0.001 vs. before RIC without pretreatment; **p < 0.002 vs. before RIC with ticagrelor pretreatment; #p = 0.002 vs. before RIC without pretreatment and p = 0.011 vs. before RIC with aspirin pretreatment; †p < 0.001 vs. after RIC without pretreatment and vs. after RIC with ticagrelor pretreatment; two-way repeated measures ANOVA with Fisher’s least significant differences post hoc tests
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Pretreatment with aspirin or ticagrelor does not impact on the cardioprotective transfer of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) via plasma-dialysate. Plasma-dialysates were prepared before and after RIC from the same volunteers (n = 18): without pretreatment (n = 18), with aspirin pretreatment (n = 18), and with ticagrelor pretreatment (n = 18), respectively. Plasma-dialysates before and after RIC were infused into isolated perfused rat hearts, respectively, which were then subjected to 30-min global ischemia/120 min reperfusion. In the aspirin pretreatment group, gray symbols indicate volunteers who were pretreated with 500 mg aspirin (n = 12) and black symbols (n = 6) those with 1000 mg aspirin.*p < 0.001 vs. before RIC without pretreatment; †p = 0.030 vs. before RIC with aspirin pretreatment; **p = 0.044 vs. before RIC with ticagrelor pretreatment and p = 0.041 vs. after RIC with aspirin pretreatment; ‡p = 0.010 vs. before RIC without pretreatment and p = 0.029 vs. before RIC with aspirin pretreatment; two-way repeated measures ANOVA with Fisher least significant differences post hoc tests
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
In response to remote ischemic conditioning (RIC), platelets transfer a cardioprotective signal through an aspirin and thus Cox-sensitive mechanism. Aspirin pretreatment of healthy volunteers abrogated RIC’s transfer of cardioprotection through washed platelets but not that through plasma-dialysate, which supports a platelet-specific component of RIC’s humoral transfer of cardioprotection. Ticagrelor pretreatment obviously did not impact on protection by RIC, since the level of infarct size reduction achieved with platelets or plasma-dialysate from blood after RIC was not different in the absence or presence of ticagrelor. Washed platelets or plasma-dialysates from volunteers before and after RIC (without or with aspirin/ticagrelor pretreatment) were infused into an isolated perfused rat heart with 30-min global ischemia and 120-min reperfusion with infarct size as endpoint

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Szummer K, Wallentin L, Lindhagen L, et al. Improved outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction during the last 20 years are related to implementation of evidence-based treatments: experiences from the SWEDEHEART registry 1995–2014. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:3056–3065. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx515. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heusch G, Gersh BJ. The pathophysiology of acute myocardial infarction and strategies of protection beyond reperfusion: a continual challenge. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:774–784. - PubMed
    1. Heusch G. Myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury and cardioprotection in perspective. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020;17:773–789. doi: 10.1038/s41569-020-0403-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schanze N, Bode C, Duerschmied D. Platelet contributions to myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1260. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01260. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Valgimigli M, Bueno H, Byrne RA, et al. 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: the task force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) Eur Heart J. 2018;39:213–260. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx419. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources