Calculating sample size for reliability studies

Affiliations

¹ Menzies Health Institute Queensland, The Hopkins Centre, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.
² National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility (NCCARF), Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.
³ School of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
⁴ Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.

David N Borg et al. PM R. 2022 Aug.

. 2022 Aug;14(8):1018-1025.

doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12850. Epub 2022 Jul 19.

¹ Menzies Health Institute Queensland, The Hopkins Centre, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.
² National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility (NCCARF), Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.
³ School of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
⁴ Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.

No abstract available

References

1. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(2):420-428.
1. Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19(1):231-240.
1. Borg DN, Osborne JO, Stewart IB, Costello JT, Sims JN, Minett GM. The reproducibility of 10 and 20 km time trial cycling performance in recreational cyclists, runners and team sport athletes. J Sci Med Sport. 2018;21(8):858-863.
1. Shrout PE. Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry. Stat Methods Med Res. 1998;7(3):301-317.
1. Bonett DG. Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Stat Med. 2002;21(9):1331-1335.