Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 20;22(1):147.
doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01633-6.

Detecting accelerometer non-wear periods using change in acceleration combined with rate-of-change in temperature

Affiliations

Detecting accelerometer non-wear periods using change in acceleration combined with rate-of-change in temperature

Adam Vert et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. .

Abstract

Background: Accelerometery is commonly used to estimate physical activity, sleep, and sedentary behavior. In free-living conditions, periods of device removal (non-wear) can lead to misclassification of behavior with consequences for research outcomes and clinical decision making. Common methods for non-wear detection are limited by data transformations (e.g., activity counts) or algorithm parameters such as minimum durations or absolute temperature thresholds that risk over- or under-estimating non-wear time. This study aimed to advance non-wear detection methods by integrating a 'rate-of-change' criterion for temperature into a combined temperature-acceleration algorithm.

Methods: Data were from 39 participants with neurodegenerative disease (36% female; age: 45-83 years) who wore a tri-axial accelerometer (GENEActiv) on their wrist 24-h per day for 7-days as part of a multi-sensor protocol. The reference dataset was derived from visual inspection conducted by two expert analysts. Linear regression was used to establish temperature rate-of-change as a criterion for non-wear detection. A classification and regression tree (CART) decision tree classifier determined optimal parameters separately for non-wear start and end detection. Classifiers were trained using data from 15 participants (38.5%). Outputs from the CART analysis were supplemented based on edge cases and published parameters.

Results: The dataset included 186 non-wear periods (85.5% < 60 min). Temperature rate-of-change over the first five minutes of non-wear was - 0.40 ± 0.17 °C/minute and 0.36 ± 0.21 °C/minute for the first five minutes following device donning. Performance of the DETACH (DEvice Temperature and Accelerometer CHange) algorithm was improved compared to existing algorithms with recall of 0.942 (95% CI 0.883 to 1.0), precision of 0.942 (95% CI 0.844 to 1.0), F1-Score of 0.942 (95% CI 0.880 to 1.0) and accuracy of 0.996 (0.994-1.000).

Conclusion: The DETACH algorithm accurately detected non-wear intervals as short as five minutes; improving non-wear classification relative to current interval-based methods. Using temperature rate-of-change combined with acceleration results in a robust algorithm appropriate for use across different temperature ranges and settings. The ability to detect short non-wear periods is particularly relevant to free-living scenarios where brief but frequent removals occur, and for clinical application where misclassification of behavior may have important implications for healthcare decision-making.

Keywords: Accelerometry; Algorithm; Behavior classification; Non-wear detection; Physical activity; Remote monitoring; Wearables.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Sample temperature profile for sleep versus non-wear
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Relationship between starting temperature (°C) and maximum negative rate-of-change (°C/minute) at 1, 3, 5, and 10 minutes (Fig. 2A-D, respectively) using data from the training dataset. Dashed line indicates zero slope. Shaded band represents the 95% confidence interval
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Distribution of non-wear periods by duration (minutes) with periods less than 60 minutes (top) and greater than 60 minutes (bottom)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Average rate-of-change in temperature (°C/minute) by minute into non-wear period for data from the training dataset

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bonato P. Wearable sensors and systems. IEEE Engi Med Biol Mag. 2010;29:25–36. doi: 10.1109/MEMB.2010.936554. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Majumder S, Mondal T, Deen MJ. Wearable sensors for remote health monitoring. Sensors. 2017;17:1–45. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2017.2726304. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morgan C, Rolinski M, McNaney R, Jones B, Rochester L, Maetzler W, et al. Systematic review looking at the use of technology to measure free-living symptom and activity outcomes in Parkinson’s disease in the home or a home-like environment. J Parkinsons Dis. 2020;10:429–454. doi: 10.3233/JPD-191781. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Patel S, Park H, Bonato P, Chan L, Rodgers M. A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation. J NeuroEngi Rehabil. 2012;9:1–17. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmadi MN, Nathan N, Sutherland R, Wolfenden L, Trost SG. Non-wear or sleep? Evaluation of five non-wear detection algorithms for raw accelerometer data. J Sports Sci. 2020;38:399–404. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1703301. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types