Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 20;22(1):228.
doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02453-4.

Long-term impact of delayed follow-up due to COVID-19 lockdown on patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration

Affiliations

Long-term impact of delayed follow-up due to COVID-19 lockdown on patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration

Stephan Szegedi et al. BMC Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Background: During the first wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in 2020 outpatient care of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) patients was severely reduced due to lockdown. Missed visits are known to be detrimental to patients in need of continued anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) intravitreal injections (IVIs). The purpose of the study was to assess the effect of a month-long pause of regular visits and anti-VEGF IVIs in nAMD patients.

Methods: A retrospective study was performed. Patients were treated in a pro re nata ("as needed") scheme. Distance (logMAR) and near (logRAD) visual acuity (VA), optical coherence tomography, delay between planned and actual visit date and the indication for IVI were assessed for 3 continous visits in the 6 months before lockdown (V-3, -2, -1) and the 2 visits after lockdown (V0, V + 1). For analysis of long-term impact, records for visits 1 years before and after lockdown (V-3, V + 2) were gathered.

Results: We included 166 patients (120 female, 46 male) with a median (range) age of 80.88 (59.8-99.36) years. Compared to V-1, distance VA was significantly worse at both V0 (0.27 ± 0.21 vs 0.31 ± 0.23 logMAR, p < 0.001) and V + 1 (0.27 ± 0.21 vs 0.30 ± 0.23 logMAR, p = 0.021). Near VA was significantly worse at both V0 (0.31 ± 0.21 vs 0.34 ± 0.22 logRAD, p = 0.037) and V + 1 (0.31 ± 0.21 vs 0.34 ± 0.22 logRAD, p = 0.02). Visit delay (VD) at V0 was significantly longer than at V + 1 (30.81 ± 20.44 vs 2.02 ± 6.79 days, p < 0.0001). Linear regression analysis showed a significant association between visit delay and a reduction of near VA between V-1 and V + 1 (p = 0.0223). There was a significant loss of distance VA (p = 0.02) in the year after the lockdown period (n = 125) compared to the year before. Loss of reading acuity was not significantly increased (p = 0.3). One year post lockdown, there was no correlation between VA change and visit delay after lockdown (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: In nAMD patients whose visits and treatment were paused for a month during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, we found a loss of VA immediately after lockdown, which persisted during follow-up despite re-established anti-VEGF treatment. In the short term, length of delay was predictive for loss of reading VA. The comparison of development of VA during the year before and after the lockdown showed a progression of nAMD related VA loss which may have been accelerated by the disruption of regular visits and treatment.

Trial registration: This article does not report the outcome of a health care intervention. This retrospective study was therefore not registered in a clinical trials database.

Keywords: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interests concerning this study.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
VA (logMAR) over time, error bars represent standard error of the mean, ns not significant (p ≥ 0.05), * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001. (n = 166)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Near VA (logRAD) over time, error bars represent standard error of the mean, ns not significant (p ≥ 0.05), * p < 0.05. (n = 166)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
CRT (µm) over time, error bars represent standard error of the mean, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. (n = 166)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
VA letters change from V-4 over time, red line indicates lockdown (n = 125)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Near VA letters change from V-4 over time, red line indicates lockdown (n = 125)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Korobelnik J-F, Loewenstein A, Eldem B, et al. Guidance for anti-VEGF intravitreal injections during the COVID-19 pandemic. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 2020;258:1149–1156. doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04703-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Szegedi S, Huf W, Miháltz K, Vécsei-Marlovits PV. Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients presenting for intravitreal injection. Spektrum der Augenheilkunde. 2021;35:70–74. doi: 10.1007/s00717-020-00473-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ramakrishnan MS, Yu Y, VanderBeek BL. Association of Visit adherence and visual acuity in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration: secondary analysis of the comparison of age-related macular degeneration treatment trial. JAMA Ophthalmology. 2020;138:237–242. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.4577. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greenlee TE, Wang VY, Kang H, et al. Consequences of lapses in treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors in neovascular age-related macular degeneration in routine clinical practice. Retina. 2021;41:581–587. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002888. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Radner W, Willinger U, Obermayer W, et al. A new German reading chart for the simultaneous evaluation of reading acuity and reading speed. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1998;213:174–181. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1034969. - DOI - PubMed

Substances