Are Altered Kinematics in Runners With Patellofemoral Pain Sex Specific?
- PMID: 35596521
- PMCID: PMC9631037
- DOI: 10.1177/19417381221088582
Are Altered Kinematics in Runners With Patellofemoral Pain Sex Specific?
Abstract
Background: Altered kinematics have been frequently observed in runners with patellofemoral pain (PFP), and few studies have aimed to understand the influence of sex on kinematics of this population. The aim of this study was to investigate whether altered hip and knee kinematics in runners with PFP are sex specific.
Hypothesis: Kinematics will be different between female and male runners with and without PFP.
Study design: Case-control study.
Level of evidence: Level 2.
Methods: Eighty-four runners were divided into 4 groups: 42 runners with PFP (20 women, 22 men) and 42 asymptomatic runners (21 women, 21 men). Three-dimensional gait analyses of the hip in the frontal and transverse plane and the knee in the frontal plane were analyzed at self-selected running speed on a treadmill. One-way analysis of covariance was used to test for differences in kinematic variables between groups.
Results: Women with PFP ran with a significantly greater peak hip adduction compared with men with PFP (mean difference [MD] = 4.45°; P = 0.00; effect size [ES] = 0.58) and male control subjects (MD = 4.2°; P = 0.01; ES = 0.54) and greater hip adduction range of motion (ROM) than men with PFP (MD = 3.44°; P = 0.01; ES = 0.49). No significant differences were identified between women with and without PFP. Female control subjects ran with greater peak hip adduction than men with PFP (MD = 5.46°; P < 0.01; ES = 0.58) and male control subjects (MD = 5.21°; P < 0.01; ES = 0.55); greater hip adduction ROM than men with PFP (MD = 4.02°; P = 0.00; ES = 0.52) and male control subjects (MD = 2.91°;P = 0.04; ES = 0.36); and greater peak knee abduction than men with PFP (MD = 3.35°; P = 0.02; ES = 0.44) and male control subjects (MD = 3.69°; P = 0.01; ES = 0.4).
Conclusion: Women have greater hip adduction than men regardless of the presence of PFP. There were no kinematics difference between women with and without PFP. Comparisons of hip internal rotation between all groups were nonsignificant.
Clinical relevance: Altered hip and knee kinematics does not appear to be sex specific in runners with PFP.
Keywords: hip; knee; men; rehabilitation; running; women.
Conflict of interest statement
The following authors declared potential conflicts of interest: B.C.L. received a grant from Coordenação de Apoio a Pessoal de Ensino Superior (CAPES), Finance Code 001.
Similar articles
-
A 10% Increase in Step Rate Improves Running Kinematics and Clinical Outcomes in Runners With Patellofemoral Pain at 4 Weeks and 3 Months.Am J Sports Med. 2019 Dec;47(14):3406-3413. doi: 10.1177/0363546519879693. Epub 2019 Oct 28. Am J Sports Med. 2019. PMID: 31657964 Free PMC article.
-
Do exist differences in kinematics and EMG of the hip and knee between male runners with and without patellofemoral pain in different running speeds?Phys Ther Sport. 2023 Jan;59:122-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2022.12.006. Epub 2022 Dec 12. Phys Ther Sport. 2023. PMID: 36529056
-
The effect of pain on hip and knee kinematics during running in females with chronic patellofemoral pain.Gait Posture. 2012 Jul;36(3):596-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.05.023. Epub 2012 Jun 30. Gait Posture. 2012. PMID: 22749951
-
Hip Range of Motion During Passive and 1-Leg Exercises Is Greater in Women: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.Arthroscopy. 2024 Feb;40(2):495-512.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.04.006. Epub 2023 Apr 26. Arthroscopy. 2024. PMID: 37116553
-
Risk factors for patellofemoral pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Br J Sports Med. 2019 Mar;53(5):270-281. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098890. Epub 2018 Sep 21. Br J Sports Med. 2019. PMID: 30242107
Cited by
-
50 Years of Title IX.Sports Health. 2022 Nov-Dec;14(6):793-794. doi: 10.1177/19417381221129265. Sports Health. 2022. PMID: 36317472 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Walking biomechanics in women with patellofemoral osteoarthritis differ compared to men with and women without patellofemoral osteoarthritis.Braz J Phys Ther. 2024 Nov-Dec;28(6):101132. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101132. Epub 2024 Oct 30. Braz J Phys Ther. 2024. PMID: 39476510 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bonacci J, Hall M, Fox A, Saunders N, Shipsides T, Vicenzino B. The influence of cadence and shoes on patellofemoral joint kinetics in runners with patellofemoral pain. J Sci Med Sport. 2018;21:574-578. - PubMed
-
- Brown A, Zifchock R, Hillstrom H, Song J, Tucker C. The effects of fatigue on lower extremity kinematics, kinetics and joint coupling in symptomatic female runners with iliotibial band syndrome. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2016;39:84-90. - PubMed
-
- Brughelli M, Cronin J, Chaouachi A. Effects of running velocity on running kinetics and kinematics. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25:933-939. - PubMed
-
- Cheung R, Davis I. Landing pattern modification to improve patellofemoral pain in runners: a case series. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011;4:914-919. - PubMed
-
- Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Revised Edition. New York: Academic Press; 1977.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous