Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep;235(5):2099-2110.
doi: 10.1111/nph.18266. Epub 2022 Jun 23.

Direct evidence supporting Darwin's hypothesis of cross-pollination promoted by sex organ reciprocity

Affiliations

Direct evidence supporting Darwin's hypothesis of cross-pollination promoted by sex organ reciprocity

Violeta I Simón-Porcar et al. New Phytol. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

The floral phenotype plays a main role in the attraction and fit of pollinators. Both perianth traits and the positioning of sex organs can be subjected to natural selection and determine nonrandom mating patterns in populations. In stylar-polymorphic species, the Darwinian hypothesis predicts increased mating success between individuals with sex organs at equivalent heights (i.e. with higher reciprocity). We used paternity analyses in experimental populations of a stylar-dimorphic species. By comparing the observed mating patterns with those expected under random mating, we tested the effects of sex organ reciprocity and perianth traits on mating success. We also analysed phenotypic selection on perianth traits through female and male functions. The (dis)similarity of parental perianth traits had no direct effects on the mating patterns. Sex organ reciprocity had a positive effect on mating success. Narrow floral tubes increased this effect in upper sex organs. Perianth traits showed little signs of phenotypic selection. Female and absolute fitness measures resulted in different patterns of phenotypic selection. We provide precise empirical evidence of the Darwinian hypothesis about the functioning of stylar polymorphisms, demonstrating that mating patterns are determined by sex organ reciprocity and only those perianth traits which are critical to pollinator fit.

Keywords: Narcissus papyraceus; cross-pollination; floral traits; mating patterns; phenotypic selection; sex organ reciprocity; stylar polymorphism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Short‐styled (left) and long‐styled (right) flowers of Narcissus papyraceus with indication of the floral traits measured in the parental individuals of this study: corolla width (1), corona width (2), tube width (3), corona height (4), tube length (5), upper anthers height (6), lower anthers height (7), style length (8). All floral traits were measured in both morphs.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Within‐pair correlations of perianth traits of Narcissus papyraceus in each pollination environment, including null distributions (open bars) under the hypothesis of random mating and observed values (red dashed lines) of the Pearson correlation coefficient. LTPE, long‐tongued pollination environment; STPE, short‐tongued pollination environment.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Distributions of the observed and expected mismatch values of maternal stigma and paternal anthers under random mating, for each sex organs level, in the experimental populations of Narcissus papyraceus at each pollination environment. The results of Wilcoxon rank‐sum test comparing observed vs expected values are provided in each plot. A normal probability curve has been fitted to the histograms to ease visualization. LTPE, long‐tongued pollination environment; STPE, short‐tongued pollination environment.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Phenotypic selection on floral traits of Narcissus papyraceus calculated in experimental populations. Estimates (±SE) from (a) univariate and (b) multivariate regressions of female (λ F), male (λ M) and absolute (λ A) reproductive success of individuals on floral traits. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; †, P < 0.1. (ns) not significant after Bonferroni correction of P‐values in multiple univariate models.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abdusalam A, Liao WJ, Zhang ZQ, Li QJ. 2022. Pollinator shifts along an elevation gradient mediate different response in self‐pollination in heterostylous Primula nivalis . Journal of Systematics and Evolution 60: 186–195.
    1. Adler LS, Irwin RE. 2006. Comparison of pollen transfer dynamics by multiple floral visitors: experiments with pollen and fluorescent dye. Annals of Botany 97: 141–150. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aedo C. 2013. Narcissus L. (Amaryllidaceae). In: Rico E, Crespo MB, Quintanar A, Herrero A, Aedo C, eds. Flora Ibérica, vol. XX. Liliaceae‐Agavaceae. Madrid, Spain: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 340–397.
    1. de Almeida NM, de Castro CC, de Lima Leite AV, Novo RR, Machado IC. 2013. Enantiostyly in Chamaecrista ramosa (Fabaceae‐Caesalpinioideae): floral morphology, pollen transfer dynamics and breeding system. Plant Biology 15: 369–375. - PubMed
    1. Alves dos Santos I. 2002. Flower‐visiting bees and the breakdown of the tristylous breeding system of Eichhornia azurea (Swartz) Kunth (Pontederiaceae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 77: 499–507.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources