Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jul;600(13):3053-3067.
doi: 10.1113/JP282568. Epub 2022 May 31.

Remote ischaemic preconditioning - translating cardiovascular benefits to humans

Affiliations
Review

Remote ischaemic preconditioning - translating cardiovascular benefits to humans

James A Lang et al. J Physiol. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC), induced by intermittent periods of limb ischaemia and reperfusion, confers cardiac and vascular protection from subsequent ischaemia-reperfusion (IR) injury. Early animal studies reliably demonstrate that RIPC attenuated infarct size and preserved cardiac tissue. However, translating these adaptations to clinical practice in humans has been challenging. Large clinical studies have found inconsistent results with respect to RIPC eliciting IR injury protection or improving clinical outcomes. Follow-up studies have implicated several factors that potentially affect the efficacy of RIPC in humans such as age, fitness, frequency, disease state and interactions with medications. Thus, realizing the clinical potential for RIPC may require a human experimental model where confounding factors are more effectively controlled and underlying mechanisms can be further elucidated. In this review, we highlight recent experimental findings in the peripheral circulation that have added valuable insight on the mechanisms and clinical benefit of RIPC in humans. Central to this discussion is the critical role of timing (i.e. immediate vs. delayed effects following a single bout of RIPC) and the frequency of RIPC. Limited evidence in humans has demonstrated that repeated bouts of RIPC over several days uniquely improves vascular function beyond that observed with a single bout alone. Since changes in resistance vessel and microvascular function often precede symptoms and diagnosis of cardiovascular disease, repeated bouts of RIPC may be promising as a preclinical intervention to prevent or delay cardiovascular disease progression.

Keywords: endothelial function; flow-mediated dilatation; ischaemia-reperfusion injury; microvascular function; repeated remote ischaemic preconditioning; skin blood flow; vascular; vascular smooth muscle.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No competing interests declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the triggers and cardiovascular benefits of remote ischaemic preconditioning
Figure 2
Figure 2. Proposed mechanism of remote ischaemic preconditioning for a single bout, both first and second windows of protection, and following repeated bouts
AA, arachidonic acid; ACh, acetylcholine; CaN, calcineurin; CGRP, calcitonin gene‐related peptide; CGRP‐R, calcitonin gene‐related peptide receptor; COX, cyclooxygenase; CYP, cytochrome P450; EDHF, endothelium‐derived hyperpolarizing factor; ERK1/2, extracellular signal‐regulated kinases 1 and 2; eNOS, endothelial nitric oxide synthase; HIF‐1α, hypoxia‐inducible factor 1α; HSP, heat shock protein; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase; IP3, inositol 1,4,5‐trisphosphate; LOX, 5‐lipoxygenase; MAPK, mitogen activated protein kinase; MnSOD, manganese superoxide dismutase; mPTP, mitochondrial permeability transition pore; NFAT, nuclear factor of activated T cells; NF‐κB, nuclear factor κB; NO, nitric oxide; PGI2, prostaglandin I2; PI3K, phosphoinositide 3‐kinase; PIP2, phosphatidylinositol 4,5‐bisphosphate; PKA, protein kinase A; PKC, protein kinase C; PKG, protein kinase G; PLA2, phospholipase A2; ROS, reactive oxygen species; sGC, soluble guanylate cyclase; TRPV, transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V; VEGFR2, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abularrage, C. J. , Sidawy, A. N. , Aidinian, G. , Singh, N. , Weiswasser, J. M. , & Arora, S. (2005). Evaluation of the microcirculation in vascular disease. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 42(3), 574–581. - PubMed
    1. Albrecht, M. , Zitta, K. , Bein, B. , Wennemuth, G. , Broch, O. , Renner, J. , Schuett, T. , Lauer, F. , Maahs, D. , Hummitzsch, L. , Cremer, J. , Zacharowski, K. , & Meybohm, P. (2013). Remote ischemic preconditioning regulates HIF‐1alpha levels, apoptosis and inflammation in heart tissue of cardiosurgical patients: A pilot experimental study. Basic Research in Cardiology, 108(1), 314. - PubMed
    1. Angius, L. , Pageaux, B. , Crisafulli, A. , Hopker, J. , & Marcora, S. M. (2022). Ischemic preconditioning of the muscle reduces the metaboreflex response of the knee extensors. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 122(1), 141–155. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baxter, G. F. , Goma, F. M. , & Yellon, D. M. (1997). Characterisation of the infarct‐limiting effect of delayed preconditioning: Timecourse and dose‐dependency studies in rabbit myocardium. Basic Research in Cardiology, 92(3), 159–167. - PubMed
    1. Behmenburg, F. , van Caster, P. , Bunte, S. , Brandenburger, T. , Heinen, A. , Hollmann, M. W. , & Huhn, R. (2018). Impact of anesthetic regimen on remote ischemic preconditioning in the rat heart in vivo. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 126(4), 1377–1380. - PubMed