Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 21;8(1):106.
doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01067-3.

Feasibility and acceptability of high-intensity interval training and moderate-intensity continuous training in kidney transplant recipients: the PACE-KD study

Roseanne E Billany  1   2 , Alice C Smith  2   3 , Ganisha M Hutchinson  4 , Matthew P M Graham-Brown  1   2 , Daniel G D Nixon  2   3 , Nicolette C Bishop  5
Affiliations

Feasibility and acceptability of high-intensity interval training and moderate-intensity continuous training in kidney transplant recipients: the PACE-KD study

Roseanne E Billany et al. Pilot Feasibility Stud. .

Abstract

Background: Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) exhibit unique elevated inflammation, impaired immune function, and increased cardiovascular risk. Although exercise reduces cardiovascular risk, there is limited research on this population, particularly surrounding novel high-intensity interval training (HIIT). The purpose of this pilot study was to determine the feasibility and acceptability of HIIT in KTRs.

Methods: Twenty KTRs (male 14; eGFR 58±19 mL/min/1.73 m2; age 49±11 years) were randomised and completed one of three trials: HIIT A (4-, 2-, and 1-min intervals; 80-90% watts at V̇O2peak), HIITB (4×4 min intervals; 80-90% V̇O2peak) or MICT (~40 min; 50-60% V̇O2peak) for 24 supervised sessions on a stationary bike (approx. 3x/week over 8 weeks) and followed up for 3 months. Feasibility was assessed by recruitment, retention, and intervention acceptability and adherence.

Results: Twenty participants completed the intervention, and 8 of whom achieved the required intensity based on power output (HIIT A, 0/6 [0%]; HIITB, 3/8 [38%]; MICT, 5/6 [83%]). Participants completed 92% of the 24 sessions with 105 cancelled and rescheduled sessions and an average of 10 weeks to complete the intervention. Pre-intervention versus post-intervention V̇O2peak (mL/kg-1/min-1) was 24.28±4.91 versus 27.06±4.82 in HIITA, 24.65±7.67 versus 27.48±8.23 in HIIT B, and 29.33±9.04 versus 33.05±9.90 in MICT. No adverse events were reported.

Conclusions: This is the first study to report the feasibility of HIIT in KTRs. Although participants struggled to achieve the required intensity (power), this study highlights the potential that exercise has to reduce cardiovascular risk in KTRs. HIIT and MICT performed on a cycle, with some modification, could be considered safe and feasible in KTRs. Larger scale trials are required to assess the efficacy of HIIT in KTRs and in particular identify the most appropriate intensities, recovery periods, and session duration. Some flexibility in delivery, such as incorporating home-based sessions, may need to be considered to improve recruitment and retention.

Trial registration: ISRCTN, ISRCTN17122775 . Registered on 30 January 2017.

Keywords: Cardiovascular disease; Chronic kidney disease; Feasibility; High-intensity interval training; Kidney transplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic diagram of HIIT interventions A and B
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flow of participants through the trial
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Chan W, Bosch JA, Jones D, et al. Obesity in kidney transplantation. J Ren Nutr. 2014;24(1):1–12. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2013.09.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kiberd BA. Cardiovascular disease in kidney transplant recipients. Population. 2007;12:13.
    1. UK Renal Registry. (2021). UK Renal Registry 23rd Annual Report - data to 31/12/2019, Bristol, UK. Retrieved from renal.org/audit-research/annual-report
    1. Mansell H, Rosaasen N, Dean J, et al. Evidence of enhanced systemic inflammation in stable kidney transplant recipients with low Framingham risk scores. Clin Transplant. 2013;27(4):E391–EE99. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12159. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Foley RN, Parfrey PS, Sarnak MJ. Clinical epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in chronic renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998;32(5):S112–SS19. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.1998.v32.pm9820470. - DOI - PubMed