Comparison of endoscopic vs microscopic ossiculoplasty: a study of 157 consecutive cases
- PMID: 35598229
- DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07451-2
Comparison of endoscopic vs microscopic ossiculoplasty: a study of 157 consecutive cases
Abstract
Purpose: The relatively new technique of trans-canal endoscopic ear surgery (TEES) when compared to microsurgery for ossiculoplasty has advantages of better visualization and no external incision but also has the disadvantage of being a one-handed procedure. Our study aimed to compare audiometric outcomes following ossiculoplasty performed via TESS with results of microsurgery.
Materials and methods: Data from a prospective audit of 157 consecutive patients who underwent ossiculoplasty by a single otologist from 2009 to 2018 was analyzed. TEES was introduced in the department in 2014; therefore, all patients before this period underwent microsurgery. Patients were classified by surgical approach, TEES, or microsurgery. Audiological outcomes were recorded at 3 and 12 months postoperatively and compared to pre-operative levels. Other variables included were the condition of stapes and reconstruction material used.
Results: Of the 157 cases, 50 were TEES and 107 were microsurgery (81 microscope only and 27 combined with endoscope). There was statistically significant improvement (p < 0.001) in AC (43.4 dB pre-operatively, 36.2 dB postoperatively), BC (20.3 dB pre-operatively, 17.6 dB postoperatively), and ABG (21.8 dB pre-operatively, 16.7 dB postoperatively) in the total cohort. Both groups achieved an ABG better than 20 dB; 72% in TEES, 73% in the microscopic group, and there was no significant difference. There was no change in hearing at 12 months when compared to 3 months. No statistically significant difference was noted based on stapes condition, type of material used for ossiculoplasty, or tympanic membrane graft.
Conclusion: TEES is safe and as effective as microsurgery in ossiculoplasty with possibly much less pain and morbidity.
Keywords: Endoscopic; Hearing loss; Ossiculoplasty; Tympanomastoidectomy; Tympanoplasty.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Bennett ML, Zhang D, Labadie RF, Noble JH (2016) Comparison of middle ear visualization with endoscopy and microscopy. Otol Neurotol 37(4):362–366. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000988 - DOI
-
- Kobayashi T, Gyo K, Komori M, Hyodo M (2015) Efficacy and safety of transcanal endoscopic ear surgery for congenital cholesteatomas: a preliminary report. Otol Neurotol 36(10):1644–1650. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000857 - DOI
-
- Anzola JF, Nogueira JF (2016) Endoscopic techniques in tympanoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 49(5):1253–1264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2016.05.016 - DOI
-
- Ryan PJ, Patel NP (2020) Endoscopic management of pediatric cholesteatoma (Erratum in: J Otol. 2020;15(4):179). J Otol 15(1):17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joto.2018.11.009 - DOI
-
- Bhardwaj A, Anant A, Bharadwaj N, Gupta A, Gupta S (2018) Stapedotomy using a 4 mm endoscope: any advantage over a microscope? J Laryngol Otol 132(9):807–811. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215118001548 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous