Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of microinvasive breast cancer: A population-based analysis
- PMID: 35598300
- PMCID: PMC9741986
- DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4839
Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of microinvasive breast cancer: A population-based analysis
Abstract
Objectives: Microinvasive breast cancer (MIBC) is a special type of breast cancer with a relatively low prevalence, of which the understanding remains controversial. In this article, we aimed to clarify the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of MIBC in the setting of different molecular subtypes and give feasible suggestions on clinical practice in MIBC.
Methods: This study utilized the data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients were divided into subgroups based on the molecular subtypes, of which the clinicopathological characteristics were further undergone comparative analyses. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis were employed to determine the prognosis of the subtypes, and to explore the prognostic factors. Patients were randomly assigned in a 7:3 ratio to the training and validation cohorts. The independent risk variables were then adopted to generate a nomogram to predict the 3- and 5-year survival probability.
Results: A total of 4301 MIBC patients between 2010 and 2016 were obtained from the SEER database, which were subsequently separated into HR+/HER2- (n = 2598), HR+/HER2+ (n = 723), HR-/HER2+ (n = 633), and HR-/HER2- (n = 347) groups. The HR+/HER2+ group showed the best overall survival (OS) (81.28 months, 95% CI 80.45-82.11) compared with other groups (p = 0.0089). The application of radiotherapy in HR+/HER2- and HR+/HER2+ MIBC patients brought out additional survival benefit compared with those without radiotherapy (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.024, respectively). The prognosis among four subgroups with or without chemotherapy showed no statistical difference. Based on the curated nomogram, the high-score group exhibited a better OS compared with patients from the low-score group.
Conclusions: Profound heterogeneity was detected among different molecular subtypes in MIBC patients, of which HR+/HER2+ subtype presented the best prognosis. For HR-positive MIBC patients, increasing survival benefits could be retrieved from radiotherapy. Chemotherapy was not recommended for patients with MIBC. Individual-based protocols were introduced based on the nomogram which warranted further validation.
Keywords: breast cancer; clinical features; microinvasive carcinoma; molecular subtypes; nomogram; prognosis.
© 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Clinical significance of microinvasive breast cancer across the different subtypes and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression levels.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jul;200(1):47-61. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-06955-7. Epub 2023 May 15. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023. PMID: 37184775
-
Clinical features of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and development of a nomogram for predicting survival.ESMO Open. 2021 Aug;6(4):100232. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100232. Epub 2021 Aug 13. ESMO Open. 2021. PMID: 34392135 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical outcomes and a nomogram for de novo metastatic breast cancer with lung metastasis: a population-based study.Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 4;12(1):3597. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07565-x. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35246585 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Can neoadjuvant systemic therapy provide additional benefits for T1 HER2+ breast cancer patients: a subgroup analysis based on different high-risk signatures.Clin Transl Oncol. 2024 Sep;26(9):2323-2338. doi: 10.1007/s12094-024-03472-x. Epub 2024 Apr 9. Clin Transl Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38592638
-
Risk and prognostic factors of breast cancer with liver metastases.BMC Cancer. 2021 Mar 6;21(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07968-5. BMC Cancer. 2021. PMID: 33676449 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Prognostic Markers of Microinvasive Breast Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers (Basel). 2023 May 31;15(11):3007. doi: 10.3390/cancers15113007. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37296968 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical significance of microinvasive breast cancer across the different subtypes and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression levels.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jul;200(1):47-61. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-06955-7. Epub 2023 May 15. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023. PMID: 37184775
-
Is the risk of local recurrence higher for microinvasive breast cancer vs. early stage invasive breast cancer?Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Jun;211(2):479-487. doi: 10.1007/s10549-025-07664-z. Epub 2025 Mar 3. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025. PMID: 40032807
References
-
- Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209‐249. - PubMed
-
- Hoda SA, Chiu A, Prasad ML, Giri D, Hoda RS. Are microinvasion and micrometastasis in breast cancer mountains or molehills? Am J Surg. 2000;180(4):305‐308. - PubMed
-
- Shatat L, Gloyeske N, Madan R, O'Neil M, Tawfik O, Fan F. Microinvasive breast carcinoma carries an excellent prognosis regardless of the tumor characteristics. Hum Pathol. 2013;44(12):2684‐2689. - PubMed
-
- Sobin L, Ch W. UICC TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. Wiley‐Liss Inc; 1997:184‐187.
-
- Giuliano AE, Connolly JL, Edge SB, et al. Breast cancer‐major changes in the American joint committee on cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(4):290‐303. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous