Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug;33(8):1667-1674.
doi: 10.1111/jce.15556. Epub 2022 May 31.

Posterior wall isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation feasibility, safety, durability, and efficacy

René Worck  1 , Samuel K Sørensen  1 , Arne Johannessen  1 , Martin Ruwald  1 , Martin Haugdal  1 , Jim Hansen  1
Affiliations

Posterior wall isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation feasibility, safety, durability, and efficacy

René Worck et al. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Introduction: Posterior wall isolation (PWI) added to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is increasingly used despite limited evidence of clinical benefit. We investigated the feasibility, durability, and efficacy of index-procedure PVI + PWI radio frequency ablation (RFA) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF).

Methods and results: Twenty-four patients with PeAF participated in the prospective PeAF-Box study and underwent RFA with wide area circumferential ablation, roof- and inferior lines to achieve PVI + PWI at index procedure. Follow-up included monitoring by an implantable cardiac monitor, esophagoscopy and mandated invasive lesion-reassessment at 6 months. PWI was achieved at minor procedural cost in all patients following PVI. In 33% of patients a median of three ablations in the narrow zone between the center of the posterior wall (PW) and the posterior right carina was pivotal for swift achievement of PWI. At the 6-month reassessment procedure 85% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 77%-92%) of pulmonary veins (PVs) and 46% (95% CI: 26%-67%) of PWs remained durably isolated. AF recurred in 25% and was associated with PV-reconnection (p = .02) but not PW-reconnection (p = .27). AF-burden was 0% (interquartile range [IQR]: 0%-0%) overall and after recurrence 1% (IQR: 0%-7%).

Conclusion: Index procedure PVI + PWI for PeAF was feasible when recognizing that limited ablation in a PW center-to-right-carina zone was required in a subset of patients. Despite limited chronic PWI durability this strategy was followed by low AF-burden. A PVI + PWI strategy appears promising in ablation for PeAF.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05045131.

Keywords: AF burden; center-right zone (of left atrial posterior wall); implanted continuous rhythm monitor; mandated invasive reassessment; persistent atrial fibrillation; posterior wall.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PVI + PWI. (A) Planned lesion set with WACA segments 1–12 and Roof/Inferior segments PW1‐PW6. (B) Posterior view of actual lesion set to obtain PVI + PWI in a patient where center‐right zone ablation was required. PVI, pulmonary vein isolation; PWI, posterior wall isolation
Figure 2
Figure 2
Chronic durability of PVI + PWI after 6 months: (A) Bipolar voltage map showing durable PVI but reconnected PW with lesions (red and pink tags) to reestablish PWI. (B) Durable PVI + PWI. (C) Location and frequency of conduction gaps at 6 months mandated reassessment. PVI, pulmonary vein isolation; PWI, posterior wall isolation
Figure 3
Figure 3
Time to first recurrence of AF detected on ICM. Bar depicts 90‐day blanking period postablation. ICM, implantable cardiac monitor
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Bai R, Di Biase L, Mohanty P, et al. Proven isolation of the pulmonary vein antrum with or without left atrial posterior wall isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13:132‐140. - PubMed
    1. Chilukuri K, Scherr D, Dalal D, et al. Conventional pulmonary vein isolation compared with the ‘box isolation’ method: a randomized clinical trial. JIntervCard Electrophysiol. 2011;32:137‐146. - PubMed
    1. Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, et al HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2017;2018(20):e1‐160. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thiyagarajah A, Kadhim K, Lau DH, et al. Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of posterior wall isolation during atrial fibrillation ablation: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019;12:e007005. - PubMed
    1. Spertus J, Dorian P, Bubien R, et al. Development and validation of the atrial fibrillation effect on QualiTy‐of‐Life (AFEQT) questionnaire in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4:15‐25. - PubMed

Associated data