Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 1;114(1):30-38.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.05.002. Epub 2022 May 20.

Self-Reported COVID-19 Infections and Social Mixing Behavior at Oncology Meetings

Affiliations

Self-Reported COVID-19 Infections and Social Mixing Behavior at Oncology Meetings

Wesley J Talcott et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. .

Abstract

Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic largely suspended in-person scientific meetings because of risk of disease spread. In the era of vaccination and social distancing practices, meetings have begun returning to in-person formats. We surveyed attendees and potential attendees of 2 oncology meetings in the United States to identify rates of mixing behavior and the subsequent rate of self-reported COVID-19 infection.

Methods and materials: We collected via survey reported social mixing behavior and COVID-19 positivity (within 21 days of meeting conclusion) of actual and potential in-person attendees of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Quality Care Symposium held September 24 to 25, 2021, and the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Annual Meeting held October 24 to 27, 2021. Conference speakers and other participants were identified through publicly available meeting materials and targeted via e-mail when possible. Recruitment of additional attendees and potential attendees was also conducted through a sharable link promoted via oncology newsletters and social media. Descriptive statistics alone were performed owing to low COVID-19 event rates.

Results: Response rates from targeted conference participants with publicly available e-mails were 27.4% for the ASCO and 14.3% for the ASTRO meetings. The ASCO survey produced 94 responses (48 in-person attendees). The ASTRO survey produced 370 responses (267 in-person attendees). Across both meetings, 3 of 308 (1.0%) in-person attendees versus 2 of 141 (1.4%) nonattendees tested positive for COVID-19. Low COVID-19 positivity rates were reported among in-person attendees spending more (>20) versus fewer (≤20) hours attending live sessions (2.2% vs 0%) and among indoor social event participants versus nonparticipants (0.8% vs 1.9%). Attendees largely felt comfortable attending additional in-person meetings after experiencing ASCO (87.5%) or ASTRO (91.9%) and felt mask compliance was good or excellent at ASCO (100%) and ASTRO (94.6%) meetings.

Conclusions: In-person meetings do not seem to be contributing to high rates of new COVID-19 infections in the setting of vaccine and social distancing mandates, supporting paths forward for at least partially in-person conferences as COVID-19 becomes endemic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) diagram demonstrating study cohort selection. Abbreviations: ASCO = American Society of Clinical Oncology; ASTRO = American Society for Radiation Oncology.
Fig 2
Fig. 2
Self-reported COVID-19 positivity for combined American Society of Clinical Oncology Quality Care Symposium and American Society for Radiation Oncology Annual Meeting in-person attendees and combined nonattendees.

References

    1. Lemieux JE, Siddle KJ, Shaw BM, et al. Phylogenetic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 in Boston highlights the impact of superspreading events. Science. 2021:371. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Viglione G. A year without conferences? How the coronavirus pandemic could change research. Nature. 2020;579:327–328. - PubMed
    1. Chavez-MacGregor M, Lei X, Zhao H, Scheet P, Giordano SH. Evaluation of COVID-19 mortality and adverse outcomes in US patients with or without cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8:69–78. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pinato DJ, Patel M, Scotti L, et al. OnCovid Study Group. Time-dependent COVID-19 mortality in patients with cancer: An updated analysis of the OnCovid registry. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8:114–122. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kalia V, Srinivasan A, Wilkins L, Luker GD. Adapting scientific conferences to the realities imposed by COVID-19. Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2020;2 - PMC - PubMed