Nomogram for prediction of adverse events after lumen-apposing metal stent placement for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections
- PMID: 35599610
- DOI: 10.1111/den.14354
Nomogram for prediction of adverse events after lumen-apposing metal stent placement for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections
Abstract
Objectives: To generate a prognostic model based on a nomogram for adverse event (AE) prediction after lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) placement in patients with pancreatic fluid collections (PFC).
Methods: Data from a large multicenter series of PFCs treated with LAMS placement were retrieved. AE (overall and excluding mild events) prediction was calculated through a logistic regression model and a nomogram was created and internally validated after bootstrapping. Results were expressed in terms of odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Discrimination was assessed by c-statistics and calibrated by comparing deciles of predicted and observed ORs.
Results: Overall, 516 patients were included (males 68%, mean age 61.6 ± 15.2 years). PFCs were predominantly walled-off necrosis (52.1%). Independent predictors of AE occurrence were injury of main pancreatic duct (OR in the case of leak 2.51, 95% CI 1.06-5.97, P = 0.03; OR in the case of complete disruption 2.61, 1.53-4.45, P = 0.01), abnormal vessels (OR in the case of perigastric varices 2.90, 1.31-6.42, P = 0.008; OR in the case of pseudoaneurysm 2.99, 1.75-11.93, P = 0.002), using a multigate technique (OR 3.00, 1.28-5.24; P = 0.05), and need of percutaneous drainage (OR 2.81, 1.03-7.65, P = 0.04). By nomogram, a score beyond 200 points corresponded to a 50% probability of AE occurrence. The model was confirmed even when excluding mild AEs and it showed optimal discrimination (c-index 76.8%, 95% CI 74-79), confirmed after internal validation.
Conclusion: Patients with preprocedural evidence of pancreatic duct leak/disruption, vessel alteration, requiring percutaneous drainage or a multigate technique are at higher risk for AE.
Keywords: LAMS; complication; predictive model; pseudocyst; walled-off necrosis.
© 2022 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Anderloni A, Fabbri C, Nieto J et al. The safety and efficacy of a new 20-mm lumen apposing metal stent (LAMS) for the endoscopic treatment of pancreatic and peripancreatic fluid collections: A large international, multicenter study. Surg Endosc 2021; 35: 1741-8.
-
- Parsa N, Nieto JM, Powers P et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic walled-off necrosis using 20-mm versus 15-mm lumen-apposing metal stents: An international, multicenter, case-matched study. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 211-9.
-
- Lang GD, Fritz C, Bhat T et al. EUS-guided drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections with lumen-apposing metal stents and plastic double-pigtail stents: Comparison of efficacy and adverse event rates. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87: 150-7.
-
- Chandrasekhara V, Barthet M, Devière J et al. Safety and efficacy of lumen-apposing metal stents versus plastic stents to treat walled-off pancreatic necrosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2020; 8: E1639-53.
-
- Guzmán-Calderón E, Chacaltana A, Díaz R et al. Head-to-head comparison between endoscopic ultrasound guided lumen apposing metal stent and plastic stents for the treatment of pancreatic fluid collections: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2022; 29: 198-211.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous