Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 May 6:9:873507.
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.873507. eCollection 2022.

Bionic Prostheses: The Emerging Alternative to Vascularised Composite Allotransplantation of the Limb

Affiliations
Review

Bionic Prostheses: The Emerging Alternative to Vascularised Composite Allotransplantation of the Limb

Kavit R Amin et al. Front Surg. .

Abstract

Twenty years have surpassed since the first vascularised composite allotransplantation (VCA) of the upper limb. This is an opportunity to reflect on the position of VCA as the gold standard in limb reconstruction. The paucity of recipients, tentative clinical outcomes, and insufficient scientific progress question whether VCA will remain a viable treatment option for the growing numbers of amputees. Bionic technology is advancing at a rapid pace. The prospect of widely available, affordable, safely applied prostheses with long-standing functional benefit is appealing. Progress in the field stems from the contributions made by engineering, electronic, computing and material science research groups. This review will address the ongoing reservations surrounding VCA whilst acknowledging the future impact of bionic technology as a realistic alternative for limb reconstruction.

Keywords: amputation; bionic limb; bionic prostheses; hand transplant; machine-human interface; vascularised composite allotransplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ziegler-Graham K, MacKenzie EJ, Ephraim PL, Travison TG, Brookmeyer R. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2008) 89(3):422–9. 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bumbasirevic M, Lesic A, Palibrk T, Milovanovic D, Zoka M, Kravic-Stevovic T, et al. The current state of bionic limbs from the surgeon’s viewpoint. EFORT Open Rev. (2020) 5(2):65–72. 10.1302/2058-5241.5.180038 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosca AC, Baciu CC, Burtaverde V, Mateizer A. Psychological consequences in patients with amputation of a limb. An interpretative-phenomenological analysis. Front Psychol. (2021) 12:537493. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.537493 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Biddiss EA, Chau TT. Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: a survey of the last 25 years. Prosthet Orthot Int. (2007) 31(3):236–57. 10.1080/03093640600994581 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dubernard JM, Owen E, Lefrancois N, Petruzzo P, Martin X, Dawahra M, et al. First human hand transplantation. Case report. Transpl Int. (2000) 13(Suppl 1):S521–4. 10.1007/s001470000288 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources