Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 6:16:890682.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.890682. eCollection 2022.

Infra-Low Frequency Neurofeedback in the Treatment of Patients With Chronic Eating Disorder and Comorbid Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

Affiliations

Infra-Low Frequency Neurofeedback in the Treatment of Patients With Chronic Eating Disorder and Comorbid Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

Anna Winkeler et al. Front Hum Neurosci. .

Abstract

The treatment of patients suffering from an eating disorder and a comorbid post-traumatic stress disorder is challenging and often leads to poor outcomes. In a randomized control trial, we evaluated to what extent adding Infra-Low Frequency (ILF) neurofeedback could improve symptom reduction within an established inpatient treatment program. In a randomized two-group design, patients suffering from an eating disorder (anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, or binge eating disorder) and comorbid post-traumatic stress disorder (N = 36) were examined while attending an inpatient treatment program in a clinic for psychosomatic disorders. The intervention group received ILF neurofeedback in addition to regular therapy, while the control group received "media-supported relaxation" as a placebo intervention. At the beginning and at the end of their treatment, all participants completed the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q) as a measure of eating disorder psychopathology and the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) in order to assess symptoms of post-traumatic stress. Changes in EDE-Q and IES-R scores over time served as primary outcomes as well as an increase in body mass index in underweight patients. Secondary outcomes were the perceived benefit of the received intervention, global assessment of psychological treatment success, and complications in the course of treatment. Statistical evaluation was carried out with repeated measurement analysis of variance for the primary outcomes and with t-tests and Fisher's exact test for the secondary outcomes. Our results indicate better treatment outcomes in the ILF neurofeedback group with regard to trauma-associated avoidance as well as with regard to restraint eating and increase in body weight. Furthermore, patients who had received ILF neurofeedback rated the intervention they received and, in tendency, their overall treatment more positively and they experienced fewer complications in the course of treatment. ILF neurofeedback is very well accepted by patients and seems to provide a relevant additional benefit in some aspects of symptom reduction. Findings confirm the feasibility of embedding this treatment approach in an inpatient setting and support the case for a larger study for greater statistical power. Clinical Trial Registration: "Infra-Low Frequency Neurofeedback training in the treatment of patients with eating disorder and comorbid post-traumatic stress disorder"; German Clinical Trials Registry (https://www.drks.de; Identifier: DRKS00027826).

Keywords: eating disorder; infra-low frequency; neurofeedback; post-traumatic stress disorder; randomized control trial; symptom reduction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Neurofeedback setup (image courtesy of BEE Medic GmbH).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Participant flow.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Group × Time interaction effect on restraint (significant mean differences are indicated).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Group × Time interaction effect on avoidance (significant mean differences are indicated).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Group × Time interaction effect on BMI (significant mean differences are indicated).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association . (2013). DSM-5: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edn. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
    1. Bluhm R. L., Williamson P. C., Osuch E. A., Frewen P. A., Stevens T. K., Boksman K., et al. . (2009). Alterations in default network connectivity in posttraumatic stress disorder related to early-life trauma. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 34, 187–194. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blume M., Schmidt R., Schmidt J., Martin A., Hilbert A. (2021). EEG neurofeedback in the treatment of adults with binge-eating disorder: a randomized controlled pilot study. Neurotherapeutics 10.1007/s13311-021-01149-9. [Online ahead of print]. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bradley R., Green J., Russ E., Dutra L., Westen D. (2005). A multi-dimensional meta-analysis of psychotherapy for PTSD. Am. J. Psychiatry 162, 214–227. 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.2.214 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Caslini M., Bartoli F., Crocamo C., Dakanalis A., Clerici M., Carrà G. (2016). Disentangling the association between child abuse and eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychosom. Med. 78, 79–90. 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000233 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources