Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 May 5:13:846884.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.846884. eCollection 2022.

Potential Mechanisms of Transmission of Tick-Borne Viruses at the Virus-Tick Interface

Affiliations
Review

Potential Mechanisms of Transmission of Tick-Borne Viruses at the Virus-Tick Interface

Mahvish Maqbool et al. Front Microbiol. .

Abstract

Ticks (Acari; Ixodidae) are the second most important vector for transmission of pathogens to humans, livestock, and wildlife. Ticks as vectors for viruses have been reported many times over the last 100 years. Tick-borne viruses (TBVs) belong to two orders (Bunyavirales and Mononegavirales) containing nine families (Bunyaviridae, Rhabdoviridae, Asfarviridae, Orthomyxovirida, Reoviridae, Flaviviridae, Phenuviridae, Nyamiviridae, and Nairoviridae). Among these TBVs, some are very pathogenic, causing huge mortality, and hence, deserve to be covered under the umbrella of one health. About 38 viral species are being transmitted by <10% of the tick species of the families Ixodidae and Argasidae. All TBVs are RNA viruses except for the African swine fever virus from the family Asfarviridae. Tick-borne viral diseases have also been classified as an emerging threat to public health and animals, especially in resource-poor communities of the developing world. Tick-host interaction plays an important role in the successful transmission of pathogens. The ticks' salivary glands are the main cellular machinery involved in the uptake, settlement, and multiplication of viruses, which are required for successful transmission into the final host. Furthermore, tick saliva also participates as an augmenting tool during the physiological process of transmission. Tick saliva is an important key element in the successful transmission of pathogens and contains different antimicrobial proteins, e.g., defensin, serine, proteases, and cement protein, which are key players in tick-virus interaction. While tick-virus interaction is a crucial factor in the propagation of tick-borne viral diseases, other factors (physiological, immunological, and gut flora) are also involved. Some immunological factors, e.g., toll-like receptors, scavenger receptors, Janus-kinase (JAK-STAT) pathway, and immunodeficiency (IMD) pathway are involved in tick-virus interaction by helping in virus assembly and acting to increase transmission. Ticks also harbor some endogenous viruses as internal microbial faunas, which also play a significant role in tick-virus interaction. Studies focusing on tick saliva and its role in pathogen transmission, tick feeding, and control of ticks using functional genomics all point toward solutions to this emerging threat. Information regarding tick-virus interaction is somewhat lacking; however, this information is necessary for a complete understanding of transmission TBVs and their persistence in nature. This review encompasses insight into the ecology and vectorial capacity of tick vectors, as well as our current understanding of the predisposing, enabling, precipitating, and reinforcing factors that influence TBV epidemics. The review explores the cellular, biochemical, and immunological tools which ensure and augment successful evading of the ticks' defense systems and transmission of the viruses to the final hosts at the virus-vector interface. The role of functional genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics in profiling tick-virus interaction is also discussed. This review is an initial attempt to comprehensively elaborate on the epidemiological determinants of TBVs with a focus on intra-vector physiological processes involved in the successful execution of the docking, uptake, settlement, replication, and transmission processes of arboviruses. This adds valuable data to the existing bank of knowledge for global stakeholders, policymakers, and the scientific community working to devise appropriate strategies to control ticks and TBVs.

Keywords: immunity; salivary glands; tick microbes; tick-virus interaction; ticks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Worldwide prevalence of tick-borne viruses.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flowdiagram depicting the virus flow in Host and Vector.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Elaborating the entry of virus through mouth opening along with bleed meal into mid gut (MG), virus multiplication and transfer into ovaries (OV), Salivary glands (SG), and anal opening. From these routes virus shed with saliva, transovarial (with next progeny of ticks), and anus. Along with these four barriers 1. Entry of virus into MG-cell, 2. Exit of virus from midgut cells, 3. Entry of virus into SG-cells (acini), and 4. Exit of virus from MG-cells.

Similar articles

  • The antiviral immunity of ticks against transmitted viral pathogens.
    Talactac MR, Hernandez EP, Hatta T, Yoshii K, Kusakisako K, Tsuji N, Tanaka T. Talactac MR, et al. Dev Comp Immunol. 2021 Jun;119:104012. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2021.104012. Epub 2021 Jan 21. Dev Comp Immunol. 2021. PMID: 33484780 Review.
  • Tick-borne viruses.
    Labuda M, Nuttall PA. Labuda M, et al. Parasitology. 2004;129 Suppl:S221-45. doi: 10.1017/s0031182004005220. Parasitology. 2004. PMID: 15938513 Review.
  • The Known and Unknown of Global Tick-Borne Viruses.
    Moming A, Bai Y, Wang J, Zhang Y, Tang S, Fan Z, Deng F, Shen S. Moming A, et al. Viruses. 2024 Nov 21;16(12):1807. doi: 10.3390/v16121807. Viruses. 2024. PMID: 39772118 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Tick-borne viruses.
    Bartíková P, Holíková V, Kazimírová M, Štibrániová I. Bartíková P, et al. Acta Virol. 2017;61(4):413-427. doi: 10.4149/av_2017_403. Acta Virol. 2017. PMID: 29186958 Review.
  • Tick-Borne Viruses and Biological Processes at the Tick-Host-Virus Interface.
    Kazimírová M, Thangamani S, Bartíková P, Hermance M, Holíková V, Štibrániová I, Nuttall PA. Kazimírová M, et al. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017 Jul 26;7:339. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00339. eCollection 2017. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017. PMID: 28798904 Free PMC article. Review.

Cited by

References

    1. Ali A., Fernando Parizi L., Garcia Guizzo M., Tirloni L., Seixas A., Silva Vaz I., et al. . (2015a). Immunoprotective potential of a rhipicephalus (boophilus) microplus metalloprotease. Vet. Parasitol. 207, 107–114. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.11.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ali A., Khan S., Ali I., Karim S., da Silva Vaz I., Termignoni C. (2015b). Probing the functional role of tick metalloproteases. Physiol. Entomol. 40, 177–188. 10.1111/phen.12104 - DOI
    1. Al-Rofaai A., Bell-Sakyi L. (2020). Tick cell lines in research on tick control. Front. Physiol. 11, 152. 10.3389/fphys.2020.00152 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Althouse B. M., Hanley K. A. (2015). The tortoise or the hare? Impacts of within-host dynamics on transmission success of arthropod-borne viruses. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 370, 20140299. 10.1098/rstb.2014.0299 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Assumpção T. C., Mizurini D. M., Ma D., Monteiro R. Q., Ahlstedt S., Reyes M., et al. . (2018). Ixonnexin from tick saliva promotes fibrinolysis by interacting with plasminogen and tissue-type plasminogen activator, and prevents arterial thrombosis. Sci. Rep. 8, 4806. 10.1038/s41598-018-22780-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources